2/23/21

Ascher/Straus [Sheila Ascher and Dennis Straus] - one of the indispensible novels of the twentieth century, a complex and unsentimental examination of the tensions created by rapid social and technological change….This is fiction driven by ideas, ideas about the future, and the relentlessness of the everyday.

The Menaced Assassin: Ascher-Straus, Ascherrstraus: 9780929701035:  Amazon.com: Books

Ascher/Straus, The Menaced Assassin

McPherson; 2nd ed., 1989.

http://www.ascher-straus.com/

http://www.ascher-straus.com/the_menaced_assassin_38811.htm


The dazzling fusion of hard-boiled dialogue, psychological relativism and slapstick satire make The Menaced Assassin a postModern answer to Through the Looking Glass. Anti-heroine Celeste is an aspiring fashion designer, but first she must create an identity for herself, an identity she approaches through some "other zone" -- a mirror-world pieced together from old Hollywood movie plots, scenes out of sleazy crime novels and melodramas, ads in trashy magazines, fuzzy AM radio shows, and a stream of great overheard conversations.

"The novel's playful, nostalgic quality -- like remembering movie trivia, or guessing who gets the girl, who committed the murder -- keeps up its fast comic pace." -- Village Voice


Amazon.com: The Other Planet (9781620540336): Ascher-Straus: Books

Ascher/Straus, The Other Planet: A Novel of the

Future, McPherson, 2019. [1988.]

In this deliciously subversive novel the question is asked: Is it possible to live in the future?—andwhat would it mean to embrace the transformations created by every new thing, and at the same time to escape the depressing discrepancy between events that only happen and those which actually might?

For Valeria Florescu, the desirable pathway would lead through "a subtly coherent twining of adventures" in a personal quest for the "extraordinary." But when Valeria quits her job as research chemist at a large industrial laboratory, she discovers first that uncertainty is more than a law of particle physics. Almost immediately she encounters the contradictory allures of two attractive men: Liam Lenehan, whose mad passion for order takes the curious form of repairing obsolescence; and Humberto Vilanescu, alchemical entrepreneur and impresario of futurism. Against the claustrophobic inertia of well-meaning family members, Valeria is propelled by the magnetic promise of self-realization into adventures at supercharged Manhattan parties, orgies in postmodern condos, and tours through the decrepit wilderness of exurbia. And then, as the ruins of reality slip behind, she journeys toward the fulfillment of the ambitious yearnings of an electronic generation. . ..


“The Other Planet is one of the indispensable novels of the twentieth century, a complex and unsentimental examination of the tensions created by rapid social and technological change. Carefully constructed possibilities may be gleefully abandoned or lives that seem coherent in their design may be suddenly eclipsed by larger forces. Something sinister is still happening at the edges of perception, something both desirable and terrifying. In The Other Planet, the most common name given to that thing that inspires both longing and dread is ‘the future.’ . . . It is a journey through Ascher/Straus-world where film, TV, dreams, and brief conversations collide to create a hyperreal and moody landscape.” —from the foreword by Stephen Beachy


A growing sense of unreality surrounds Valeria Florescu as a charismatic stranger introduces her to the "real" world hidden behind the facade of normal existence. Philosophical discourse and surrealistic vignettes abound in this highly speculative novel. The writing team of Ascher/Straus affect a style reminiscent of sf experimentalists Stanislaw Lem and Samuel R. Delaney. This title is a marginal purchase for large libraries. JC


"Ascher/Straus constantly force their readers to abandon expectations. In their later work, those expectations are foiled more subtly, and within structures that resemble more traditional plots, but whose ambiguities and multiple possibilities are all the more striking for that reason. In The Other Planet, Valeria is haunted by the sense that there's a completely different way to live, akin to living on another planet, a future that one can enter now, through sheer force of will. The Other Planet examines the ways the myth of the future creates a profound disillusionment and a yearning for the impossible. It critiques that myth while harboring no nostalgia for the forms that trap characters in the present, the habits of family and full-time employment. Valeria finds herself in a traditional romantic plot, receiving attentions from two radically different suitors. There's a nice, inarticulate working-class guy who's desperately in love with her versus a creepy evil genius-entrepreneur-rapist, Humberto Vilanescu, who offers her a part in the vague and improbable 'future' as an escape from the relentlessly barren present. 'We long for life to be like a waking dream, an adventure whose coherence, whose "plot" provides something akin to meaning,' Humberto tells her. It's exhausting, their need to resist a monotonous present rooted in an overly familiar past, and offering only the clichéd scripts of family, job, romance. "Mass agreement = History," Valeria's dying mother scrawls on a pad, unable to speak. 'It happens. Again and again. There's no resisting it, though it takes you by surprise every time. Now everyone is talking about marriage again....' Valeria's not having it either. The nice guy gets left behind without a trace of sentimentality for the contrived and narcissistic 'love' he offers as some emblem of what it is to be human. Human, as currently configured, is not OK. She journeys instead through Ascher/Straus-world, a world where film, TV, dreams, and brief conversations collide to create a hyperreal and moody landscape. ....Ascher/Straus have chosen their own canon and manifested that subjective history as a unique constellation. Ascher/Straus are a crossroads where Doctor X, Shadow of a Doubt, The Damned Don't Cry, and Lola Montes come together with the sort of 'European' fiction that involves an intellectual engagement with the world. Despite all the thinking that goes on in these books, they are never pretentious, boring, or incomprehensible and are consistently funny." --Stephen Beachy

McPherson & Company is an independent publisher that issues remarkable books of fiction at a snail's pace. In an unusual twist of the turtle and the hare fable, in which the snail stands for the turtle, McPherson novels connect with the future faster than novels not yet written. In 1988, McPherson released "The Other Planet," a novel by Ascher/Straus, written collaboratively by Sheila Ascher and Dennis Straus, two dyed-in-the wool New Yorkers. The novel takes place in the idea-rich brain of a female protagonist with a Romanian last name. Her brain is so rich the ideas have to be divided between a number of characters, some of whom also have Romanian last names. These ideas ricochet all over the late 1950s, early 60s, between Long Island and Greenwich Village. The writing is deliberately color-field pointilist. For example: "As summer advanced to the point where a discerning eye could see a scorched orange in the green tunnels, Valeria went to more parties than there were days." One of the bearers of this bright prose is Humberto Villanescu, a mephistophelian character that might carry a plot if Ascher/Straus meant to have one. - Andrei Codrescu

https://www.codrescu.com/my-news/2018/8/11/rqroglk7ol4yzbdpdfd42xo0x82pp0


“Ascher/Straus have translated a post-modern aesthetic into a pretty definitive statement about the post-modern experience. [And] considering that a whole generation of artists and intellectuals have been floundering in it, trying to define it, describe it or run away from it, it’s worth noting that Ascher/Straus pin it down as astutely as they do . . . . ”

“. . . characters who can’t tell if their formless dread and existential ennui are inklings of impending apocalypse or the suppressed knowledge that civilization has already ended.

“[Valeria] is. . . a post-modern Everywoman. All the other characters she meets. . . habitually relate events in their own lives to scenes in their favorite cult movies. I feel just like Marilyn Monroe in Niagara, a woman will say, and then everyone debates the true meaning of the film, until you notice that they never get back to what it all means for the woman who said it.

“Even those who don’t admit it recognize their dilemma. They sense that the arc of the modern era has somehow fallen short of its goal, like work stopping on a half-completed bridge, suspending them between the past and the future. The future is out there, it’s potential, some of them can feel the possibilities charging the torpid atmosphere of the present, but they don’t know how to actualize it.

“In one scene, a guy at a bar snorts, ‘Now I really have heard everything.’ The bartender replies, ‘No you haven’t. There’s absolutely no limit to the things you can hear. There’s absolutely no limit to things. Things produce new things. Multiplication is the basic law of the universe.’ (Remember, this is NYC.) The guy disagrees: ‘Stand in one place long enough and everything that already exists will pass you by. Sooner or later everything that already exists appears in the mirror of waiting.’ But the bartender counters: ‘What we already know exists may be infinite, but what about what we don’t know. . . ?’ 

“Valeria experiences a moment that ‘was thick with nothing but itself: the world a dark jam of impasses that added up to the here-and-now, releasing the heady fragrance of the exact present, like the spice of weeds in vacant lots or the cultivated wildness of basil and tomato vines.’ She wonders ‘what it meant to say to become someone else. But no one had ever done that. The self was a compact and porous mass of habits and they never deserted anyone, completely or otherwise. They simply ebbed and flowed over the years…(L)ife consisted of an endless succession of deranged states, during each of which you were convinced you’d awakened from something — till you felt yourself waking up still one more time, looked back and realized you’d been “deranged” again.’

“In this floating word, sex and romance are like the debris of a former reality to which the characters cling with a hopeless desperation.

“There is, in fact, a surprising amount of sexual activity in this book, with a strong undercurrent of kinky violence. . . .

“In The Other Planet, the future is sparked by a mysterious stranger, Humberto Vilanescu. Rich, foreign, partly messianic and partly Mephistophelean, he’s a combination of the Aga Khan, Howard Hughes and The Man Who Fell To Earth. He’s the distillation of money, power, brains and high-tech futurism, which Ascher/Straus seem to be offering as one Hobbesian way out of the post-modern doldrums. He gathers about him a secretively corporatist hive of aimless technicians like Valeria, and sets them to work constructing the future. 

“It’s an interesting and often challenging scenario. Not quite a futurist manifesto, but a suggestively equivocal counterbalance of dystopia and utopia.”--John Strausbaugh, New York Press


Ascher/Straus’s coauthored novel slips around its dreamily constructed narrative. The story nominally follows Valeria through her relationships with family, lovers, and acquaintances. But these are at times glancing and at other times porous. The lives of characters intersect with each other in indeterminate ways and movies broadcast on TV in the writerly equivalent of the Kuleshov Effect. But Ascher/Straus are aware of their structure providing the reader with the winking metacommentary: “Reality now had to compete with many realities.”

The ancillary stories – the recounting of midnight movies or of vague anecdotes – erupt into the primary narrative. Not explosively, but in a slow and steady channel of magma. The effect drives the narrative forward in a way reminiscent of J. G. Ballard’s The Atrocity Exhibition. But Ascher/Straus present their narrative less jarringly, by letting episodic narratives subside and the main narrative return to prominence. The authors again provide metacommentary for their novel: “It was as if you were continually weaving a second life for yourself and this life was unavailable to you. Or as if, inside the first life, there were a pond, concealed by nothing more than forgetfulness, in which everything from the first life swam without its mask”

Valeria’s story traces the boundaries of human relationships in an age consumed by media. As Ascher/Straus imagine a future from the 1980s, they seem prescient. Even now the futurescape Valeria has helped create seems only a few years off with her prognostication that “WE DON’T WANT TO MEET CREATURES FROM ANOTHER PLANET. WE WANT TO BE CREATURES FROM ANOTHER PLANET!” - Nicholas Alexander Hayes

http://www.yourimpossiblevoice.com/review-the-other-planet-by-ascher-straus/

Red Moon, Red Lake: Stories: Ascher Straus: 9780914232971: Amazon.com: Books

Ascher/Straus, Red Moon, Red Lake: Stories,

McPherson, 1988.

http://www.ascher-straus.com/red_moon_red_lake_38815.htm


These seven interlocking stories follow the lives of four friends into a locus of nightmare -- the elusive boundary that separates TV from the real world of shady streets, withering suburbs, anxious children, random murder and bizarre mutilation. It is a zone invaded by the private dialogue of impossibly cruel sitcoms, the zone known also as the American neighborhood. Here, in an unnamed coastal community, we meet the expatriated Californian, Pam; her strange brother, Rudi (dark genius, or patsy for a serial killer?); Pam's inertial husband, Ted; Pam's deranged and extended family; and Rudi's best friend, Donald Green, highway drifter and compulsive freeloader. It's a long summer of lost jobs, asinine anniversaries, strange encouters, and garrulous gossip. A summer etched by the lucid delirium wich marks the frustration of untempered striving. In short, it's another creation of tremendous sensual immediacy, exploded familiarity, and haunting perversity from the authors of The Other Planet and The Menaced Assassin.


Enter the laconic world of Ascher/Straus (the pseudonym for Sheila Ascher and Dennis Straus, who wrote The Other Planet ) and everything comes into question. These seven interlocking stories evoke a hallucinatory world peopled by characters so alienated that their very identities are mysteries to each other. Is Pam's brother Rudi a serial killer? Is Rudi's best friend, Don, really his adversary? As their exurban neighborhood is menaced by a string of bizarre murders, these young adults become unmoored; they lose their jobs, their friends and lovers, they drift into states of lethargy. Style overshadows plotalthough the writing is uneven, it is invariably commanding. Vivid, imaginative, quirky images lend a precision to otherwise abstract themes: "His own theory is that maybe Rudi is just some sort of unhappy prehistoric throwback, if that's the right word. Maybe he was a kid who read a book about the Robber Barons and he got stuck on this idea of becoming one of those walruses with pinky rings who used to preside over board meetings like Roman emperors." Sophisticated readers will readily exchange the charted terrains of conventional fiction for the enigmatic adventures offered here. - Publishers Weekly


"Red Moon/Red Lake places the writing team of Ascher/Straus squarely in the forefront of post-modern literature. Cool and detached, the seven stories in this fascinating collection are deconstructions of reality, fragmented visions of life in a suburban hell.... Highly recommended." - Small Press Magazine


"The dreams and films reach their sinister and comic peak in Red Moon/Red Lake. This collection of stories follows a constellation of characters whose sense of coherence and plot is tied to monster movies, movies in which alien pods blow their seeds across suburban lawns, movies in which dark figures who hunger for living flesh haunt the dark spaces in between the shoddy houses of suburbs that seem to have been designed for nightmares to take place in. It's a feeling that pervades everyone and everything, so that in midsummer heat, under a blinding sun, Nora meets an old woman who speaks of how the cicadas are louder than ever before and the heat somehow darker, in a relentless monologue of horror. Nora thinks the old woman has lived too long: "Or had neither died nor survived the winter. A sort of corpse within which a tiny vocal kernel had sprouted, its roots on the other side." The old woman's daughter laughs and translates. 'What Ma means is that the air is dead and the trees are dead, and the sweat that pours off us gets filthier and fouler every year. Yet we stand out here and we keep talking and talking. We can't shut up....' Ascher/Straus-world is haunted by the belief that one's own story is composed of all the stories others tell us, even or especially those we'd rather avoid. As the most sinister possibilities eclipse the willful banality of these lives, Red Moon/Red Lake crests in the strange and complicated title story, as emotionally satisfying and dreadful as anything in contemporary fiction. ....Ascher/Straus have chosen their own canon and manifested that subjective history as a unique constellation. Ascher/Straus are a crossroads where Doctor X, Shadow of a Doubt, The Damned Don't Cry, and Lola Montes come together with the sort of 'European' fiction that involves an intellectual engagement with the world. Despite all the thinking that goes on in these books, they are never pretentious, boring, or incomprehensible and are consistently funny." --Stephen Beachy, San Francisco Bay Guardian


"To distinguish 'who wrote what' is to bow to someone else’s idea of authorship, no more acceptable than bowing to a narrow idea of what fiction can be. A long, invisible history of creating narrative outside traditional boundaries (of form, of publication, even of binding) is present in our four novels (Hank Forest's Party, ABC Street, The Menaced Assassin, The Other Planet) and the volume of related stories (Red Moon / Red Lake) that are traditionally published. In the late 70’s / early 80’s, largely in an art context, we created a series of novels we called SPACE NOVELS that used a variety of public spaces (from galleries to air fields) as bindings or structuring principles. Our idea was to create a new kind of un-bound novel, transparent and porous between writer and reader. Our early thinking about fiction, and art in general, particularly about its position between writer and reader and the ways in which the life of writer and reader (down to the ambient, intrusive event while reading or writing) can or cannot be included or suggested, has mutated over the years but never left us entirely. (ABC Street and Hank Forest's Party are its direct descendants.) That thinking and our love of the kind of philosophical narrative not thought to be 'American' has probably driven us out of the mainstream." - Ascher/Straus


Ascher/Straus, ABC Street, Green Integer, 2002. 

http://www.ascher-straus.com/abc_street_38809.htm


Authors of The Menaced Assassin, The Other Planet and Red Moon/Red Lake, the noted collaborative team of Ascher/Straus contemplates the materials of the writer's life -- "what gets cannibalized into fiction but doesn't get treated as fiction itself" -- in this new work.

A novel that takes up the tasks of the journal, ABC Street can also be read as a journal that documents the materials in the novel, grounded in observations of daily life on a single street in Rockaway, New York, where Sheila and Dennis used to live.


...Ascher/Straus's oddly structured and quietly surreal novels have been interspersed with even more oddly structured and loudly experimental novels or novel-like things; it isn't surprising, therefore, the degree to which they remain unknown, despite the intelligence and vision that crackle from every page. they've resisted the primary mechanisms of corporate publishing, which are not so different form those of most indie publishing: the creation of a recognizable stylistic and marketing niche. Instead of capitulating to the cult of personality that drives literary production in America, they have obscured and undermined the idea of themselves. Their experimentalism has been playful and evolving, depending on the shifts in their own interests more than on the requirement to be consistently "experimental enough."...

Their most recent books are the two volumes of ABC Street (ABC Street and Hank Forest's Party), released by Green Integer and placing Ascher/Straus where they belong, alongside Stein, Wilde, Poe, Celine, and Michaux, in a line publishing "Essays, Manifestos, Statements, Speeches, Maxims, Epistles, Diaristic Jottings, Narratives, Natural histories, Poems, Plays, Performances, Ramblings, Revelations, and all such ephemera as may appear necessary to bring society into a slight tremolo of confusion and fright at least." ABC Street combines the journal with the novel, a chronicle that isn't about the self that produces it but about the context that surrounds that self and about the act of chronicling itself. Its author, "Monica," is re-creating conversations that happen among constellations of characters who surround her, strictly realistic New Yorkers who seem only slightly less surreal than the characters of the previous books. Their dark sense of humor is familiar. Yvonne, herself the mother of a baby who's sucking up her life energy, confronts her destiny with words that say life stinks, a voice that says it doesn't matter: "Yvonne wants to know if Monica can figure Janey Hedges out. Janey's little one Joe Andy's not even a year old but she's got another one due in June! Janey's not stupid so why'd she need two nooses to kill herself?" Simultaneously, ABC Street sends out ripples that change our reading of the other Ascher/Straus books, blurring lines of memory and realism and imagination, while it forces us to confront the way writing itself, and the sorts of perception that drive writing, is a medium conducive only to very particular ways of understanding. Monica discovers that "what interest her as a chronicler has as little to do with what's ordinarily meant by realism as it does with what's called imagination." Chronicling is a form of editing, creating order and meaning out of disorderly experience. "But another path eludes both reader and editor, arriving in every text as if of its own free will." The chronicler's intentions go awry. Thinking and intending to write about one family, she ends up starting a book about people she hadn't thought about at all -- a collection of stories titled Red Moon/Red Lake. As much as the chronicles are about writing, however, they are even more about remembering, remembering through writing or at the edges of writing, and about the vast sea of unremembered, unchronicled, unknown events or non-events that surround the thin little stream of meaning we create with language. The two volumes of ABC Street explicitly raise questions about the function and intent of fiction and present themselves as models of something else: "a necessary aesthetic argument for a radically different basis for fiction, even more so than in the sense that every work of art is an argument for itself and against everything else."

Despite all the thinking that goes on in these books, they are never pretentious, boring, or incomprehensible, and are consistently funny. Ascher/Straus have chosen their own canon and manifested that subjective history as a unique constellation; they are a crossroads where Doctor X, Shadow of a Doubt, The Damned Don't Cry, and Lola Montes come together with the sort of "European" fiction that involves a devastating intellectual engagement with the world.... - Stephen Beachey


In April 1992 Sheila Ascher and Dennis Straus wrote me to ask if I'd be willing to read a manuscript of theirs, ABC Street. I suspect the manuscript arrived soon thereafter, but in my files the next serious correspondence was dated five years later, July 1997, at which time they sent me the dedication to the book. Only this year (2001) did they send photographs for the cover of the book now scheduled for 2002. My only reaction is that Ascher/Straus must be the most patient couple in the universe, having now waited nearly 10 years for their book to appear—combined with the fact that another manuscript of theirs, to have been issued as a early side-stapled book on the nascent Sun & Moon Press in 1978, was never published!

These incidents are made even more ironic by the fact that, although Dennis and I have kept in fairly close touch by telephone over the years, I have never met Sheila or Dennis, but simply followed their migrations from Rockaway Park and Canaan, New York to Captiva Island, Florida through phone conversations and occasional correspondence.

Given their immense patience, I thought it might be appropriate to at least indicate through this short essay what I found so interesting about their writing, particularly since a history has developed around this work that makes it very appropriate to this year's thematic stitching of My Year.

For despite the rather long relationship I have now had with Ascher/Straus, like the writing itself, it is a narrative without a coherent story. ABC Street is part of an ongoing project on which the two have been working since 1977, titled Monica's Chronicle, a day-by-day journal penned by the seemingly observant, but determinedly passive narrator, Monica. This chronicle alternates between intense depictions of the daily weather—evocative descriptions of the rain, snow, and sun Monica observes through her window and on her occasional walks—and the often gossipy comments of a large cast of characters Monica describes as "A Constellation," mostly lesbian women friends, and the various neighbors of what is obviously a location similar to Rockaway Park.

There are also silences ("Days intervene, unwritten"), undated entries, and sporadic ruminations on the nature of her writing activities. There is a strong sense that in writing Monica is forgetting or, at least, replacing the act of memory with the writing itself. If, as Lyn Hejinian argued early in her career, "Writing Is an Aid to Memory," in ABC Street "Writing isn't an aid to memory, but a replacement for it." History, accordingly, is eaten up by the narrator's acts, and as quickly becomes part of the ongoing snowfall of words that pour from Monica's pen. Individuals and their statements just as quickly are swallowed up into a kind of nonjudgmental commentary.

Just as the landscape Monica describes, the numerous human figures she portrays often collide in the reader's mind as a jumble of abstract flesh. Some families are so extended with sons and daughters, their best friends, various lovers and boarders that, although on the "Monica's Chronicle Website" created by the authors all characters are listed, the reader loses sight of the individual, and ultimately can hear only the chorus of communal voices, which is perhaps appropriate, since all the choristers are themselves singing of one another. Accordingly, although Monica can see Manhattan's Empire State Tower from her window, ABC Street is a tale of small-town living, a world in which everybody is somehow interrelated and involved in each other's lives.

Yet unlike, say Winesburg, Ohio or any of Sinclair Lewis's tales, ABC Street does not comment on or evaluate—and only seldom satirizes— its characters. Rather, they become somewhat flattened reporters of their own destinies without an audience to coherently receive their messages. As Monica describes her own conversation with one of the most memorable figures of the book, Nancy St. Cloud:

It was windy and Nancy's navy blue wraparound skirt kept

blowing open in the middle of sentences. Every time she

reached down words got irretrievably whisked away across

the flat, dazzling surface littered all the way to the horizon

with sparkling bits of green, blue and amber bottle glass, so

Monica remembered the story as incoherent, though it may

not have been.

Unlike the utter falsity of normalized fictions, accordingly, Ascher/Straus's collaborative work is not just a collaboration between authors, but a collaboration between characters and readers. As in our everyday experiences, what we receive from one another is not always what has been communicated—or even what each of us attempted to communicate. People make their own conclusions and impact one another much as in the old game of "Telephone," through incredibly garbled readings of one another's lives by people they have never met.

Although the members of the "constellation" have all had regular encounters with Dr. DaVinci, a psychiatrist influenced by Wilhelm Reich, their psychological interpretations of one another are most often mistaken and motives are regularly confused or, as in Monica's encounter with Nancy's handsome and charming husband, Andre, are represented in multiple possibilities:

(1) Real, husbandly concern. (2) Enlisting the aid of a trust-

worthy friend who happens to be intruding in any case. (3)

Aligning himself with Monica's involuntary look of distress...

(4) Distancing himself (and not only in the eyes of others) from any

accusation of complicity.

In short, in Monica's chronicles of the world around her there are no answers and relationships between people and events are at best tentative.

While normative fiction carefully constructs a set of interrelated histories that ultimately work together to present a vision of an individual or community, Ascher/Straus' work, like the characters and events of real life, keep their histories secret—even while attempting to reveal them. Like the streets and lawns of this primarily wintertime landscape, history is buried under an avalanche of information: readings and misreadings, interpretations and interventions. As Monica writes: "Our lost history is a daily panorama though not necessarily a panorama of the everyday."

Despite the enormous joy of encountering this canvas of colorful characters, accordingly, the reader realizes that in Monica's chronicle there is no way to imaginatively reach out and touch these figures, nor any way to interweave their actions into a coherent or even consistent pattern. Writing is ink on paper, and any narrative, as much as it may seek mimesis, is as absolutely flat as unprimed canvas. At the end of Ascher/Straus's book, Monica closes her winter night's tale with the words:

February turns its sharp edge, black winter on the other side of

the page.

Not only is the tale over, but the human beings it has mentioned have yet to appear, as they stand in wait on the "other side of the page." - Douglas Messerli

http://greeninteger.blogspot.com/2008/12/on-other-side-of-page-on-ascherstrauss.html


Ascher/Straus, Hank's Forest Party, Green

Integer, 2014.

http://www.ascher-straus.com/hank_forest_s_party_119739.htm


Hank Forest's Party continues to make ABC Street's tranquilly radical argument for the horizontal storytelling of life as it passes while asking itself fresh questions about time, memory and its own reasons for telling stories as it does. Unlike their previous Green Integer volume, ABC Street, the action of this fiction takes place entirely on ABC Street and the narrative circles the singular event of the title.

The two volumes of this outward-looking autobiography/novel/philosophical journal suggest a dedicated, life-long way of documenting life as fiction.

The authors have opened a channel into the background where the lives and places of the two ABC Street volumes are always forming and re-forming. The entire work, titled Monica's Chronicle, can be found at www.ascher-straus.com.


Hank Forest's Party is the latest volume of a collaborative project, part novel, part memoir, part philosophy, written by Sheila Ascher and Dennis Straus and published under the name Ascher/Straus. The ongoing project Monica's Chronicle, begun in the 1970s, is a narrative of the process of narration. Narrator Monica records experiences of everyday life in a neighborhood in Rockaway Park, Queens, and weaves her notes through reflections and reinterpretations about the connections between experience, memory, and writing.

The framing event in Hank Forest's Party is the birthday of a little boy on Monica's block. The party overlaps with Monica's efforts to remember and write about it:

Monica enters Grete and Andy's new apartment, looks around memorizing. Carries this overly-fresh memory like a bright basin of water that's going to slosh and spill with every step. Keeps spilling throughout the day, till she gets home. Already in Grete and Andy's apartment she's wondering if there will be anything left to pour out at her desk, where writing replaces memory.

The question of how experiences become stories is a constant through line:

Thinking at the party (as if already not at the party) or at home later (as if still at the party) Monica wonders why one story chooses us and not another. Many-many-too-many stories are always buzzing about, but only one buzzes up and bites us.

The time and space of the story spill far beyond the party into the extended lives of the block's residents. Monica relays intimate back stories and day-to-day details that stack and overlap like the close-quartered living spaces of the block itself. She knows her neighbors' private hopes and disappointments, as if privy to their inner monologues:

Marriage to Andy Forest changed nothing. Very disappointing to Grete. Had assumed, without thinking much about it, that marriage to Andy Forest would change the balance of life in this house, but it didn't.

Other neighbors literally walk into Monica's narrative as she records the day's events from her front porch:

Pat Corcoran steps out of her front door through Monica's writing and says that Philip passed his exam and is already working: an apprentice splicer, on his way toward becoming a full-time splicer and hopefully even a master splicer like his father, John.

But that's not what she wants to talk about, she says. Something is bothering her and she has to talk about it.

Despite the story's inquisitive and intimate tone, we never learn much about Monica herself. She explores her ideas through the material of others' lives -- a filmmaker who never comes out from behind the camera. Some of the detachment comes through the accumulation of time -- Hank Forest's Party was written 25 years after the framing events. Periodically the story is preoccupied with what was left out or lost from the first notes:

Monica's notes say: "at her desk in the red room": but now, twenty-five years later, she doesn't remember (and doesn't see how there could have been space for) a desk in the red room.

Events circle back to Hank's party, even as years pass, couples split up or move away, and Hank himself is no longer a little boy. By the end, Monica seems no more certain about the nature of storytelling, though no less energized to keep interrogating it:

True or false: what's remembered is an impediment in the stream of what-doesn't-want-to-be-remembered. What-doesn't-want-to-be-remembered seeks forgetfulness by flowing as rapidly as it can around and through memory's rusting chassis where, twenty-plus years ago, it tore up railing and embankment and landed in the river just where it makes a beautiful bend out of town. - Mary Burger

McPherson and Company - Posts | Facebook

Ascher/Straus, Letter to an Unknown Woman,

Mcpherson, 1979.


https://www.mcphersonco.com/uploads/1/1/7/4/117455904/fortnight_4r.pdf


Monica's Chronicle

Headless World (Excerpt from a Novel-in-Progress)


Since 1973 the award-winning fiction of Ascher/Straus has been appearing widely in magazines, including Chicago Review, The Paris Review, Chelsea, Sun and Moon, Epoch and Exile. Both Sheila Ascher and Dennis Straus were born in New York City, studied at Columbia University, and live on a peninsula between Jamaica Bay and the Atlantic Ocean

2/19/21

Leonor Fini - This novella’s ambiguous narrator sets off for the isolated locale of Rogomelec—where a crumbling monastery serves as a sanatorium and offers a cure involving a diet of plants and flowers—and moves through a waking dream involving strangely scented monks, vibratory concerts in a cavernous ossuary, and ritualist pomp with costumes of octopi and shining beetles

Slikovni rezultat za ROGOMELEC Leonor Fini

Leonor Fini, Rogomelec, Trans. by William

Kulik and Serena Skwersky, Wakefield Press, 

2020.


‘Originally published in French in 1979, Rogomelec was the third of Leonor Fini’s novels. All the qualities of the paintings for which she is famed can be found in it: an undermining of patriarchy, the ambiguities of gender and the slipperiness of desire, along with darker hints of cruelty and the voluptuousness of fear. This novella’s ambiguous narrator sets off for the isolated locale of Rogomelec—where a crumbling monastery serves as a sanatorium and offers a cure involving a diet of plants and flowers—and moves through a waking dream involving strangely scented monks, vibratory concerts in a cavernous ossuary, and ritualist pomp with costumes of octopi and shining beetles. As the days unfold, the narrator discovers that the “the celebration of the king” is approaching, the events of which will lead to a shocking discovery in Rogomelec’s Gothic ruins. This first English translation includes 14 drawings by Fini that accompanied the novella’s original publication.

‘Born in Argentina and raised in Italy, Leonor Fini (1907–1996), concluded a rebellious youth with a move to Paris and a career in painting. Her six decades of work as artist, illustrator, designer, and author bore close ties to the Surrealist movement, but though the Surrealists saw her as one of them, she herself never identified as a Surrealist. Rejecting the role of muse, her work focused on portrayals of women as subjects with desire as opposed to objects of desire, and was groundbreaking in its explorations of mythology, androgyny, death, and life as Mannerist theater.’


‘During her teenage years, Fini suffered from rheumatic conjunctivitis, which forced her to have her eyes bandaged and to live in total darkness for two months. She later recalls that this experience really helped to develop her imagination and to conceive complex visual imagery in her mind. The need to bandage her eyes may also have also inspired a later love of being masked. By the age of seventeen, Fini was already exhibiting her portraits in Trieste, and frequenting the artistic and literary circles of the town, where she was generally considered highly intelligent (she had read Freud before she turned sixteen) and sensitive.

‘In 1931, she moved briefly to Milan and then to Paris where she became acquainted with Carlos Carrà and Giorgio de Chirico; both became profound influences on the aspiring young artist. By this point, Fini was an ambitious 24 year old, with, as art critic Sarah Kent writes, “a gift for friendship – people loved her warmth, intelligence, and beauty”. It was at this time that she met Max Ernst, who became her lover and introduced her to the Surrealists, including Man Ray, Salvador Dalí, and Henri Cartier-Bresson along with many other painters and writers of the group.

‘Fini quickly became an integral part of the Parisian art scene and social circles. She became known for her eccentricity, flamboyant personality, and particularly theatrical ways of dressing. Art critic Sarah Kent says, “She would dye her hair blue, orange, red or gold and attend private views and parties dressed as a man, or wearing nothing but white boots and a cape of white feathers”. During this time, she was also exhibiting her work in Parisian art galleries – one of her first exhibitions was at Christian Dior’s gallery that was run by Dior before he became an acclaimed fashion designer.

‘Throughout this time, Fini also worked as an accomplished portraitist (painting portraits of many celebrities and visitors to Paris, and especially of her friends including writer Jean Genet, actress Maria Casarès, ballerina Margot Fonteyn, and the socialite Hélène Rochas) as well as an illustrator, illustrating Edgar Allan Poe and Shakespeare, and often donating her drawings to new emerging writers. Besides being generous, she was talented, glamorous, and often perceived as being profoundly controversial. Art critic Catherine Styles McLeod describes her as “magnificent, perturbing, mocking enigmatic, terrible, and compassionate”. Art critic Joseph Nechvatal further enhances her colorful existence in that he writes, “her wild lifestyle, open bisexuality, and infamous ménage à trois relationships shocked even the Parisian café society”.’ — The Art Story




Graham Freestone - we cannot extirpate the experience of paranormality from our lives. Furthermore, since we cannot remove the phenomena with a ‘solid world’ ontology, we should at least consider what the alternative would look like


Graham Freestone, Tractatus Pneumatologico Philosophicus, Centre for Experimental Ontology, 2019.

https://centreforexperimentalontology.com/author/grahamfreestone/


The Tractatus is largely an exploration of what is commonly referred to on CEO blog as accretive theory, or pneuminous accretive theory. The basic notion is that that phenomenologically paranormality is best disclosed by substantialised conceptuality, referred to in the text as ‘pneuma’. The book details the implication of certain occult appearances and how they create epistemological challenges that we often try to brush over. Pneuma and its correlate, the umbratic are simply notions that appear when one accepts a certain relativisation of the phenomena.

“The problem of paranormality is a thorn in the side of philosophy. It makes Cartesian doubt look like viable worry. Ensconced in its own dream of solid world rationality, philosophy fails to pay attention to the fact that psychological explanations for paranormal phenomena are not proof that the psychological explanations are correct. Whilst the Tractatus in no way says that paranormality actually obtains, what it is does say is that we cannot extirpate the experience of paranormality from our lives. Furthermore, since we cannot remove the phenomena with a materialist ontology, we should at least consider what the alternative would look like.

The Tractatus is largely concerned with exploring this alternative ontology -whilst accepting it is potentially just an appearance. Taking cues from chaos magickal insights and grounding itself in the experience of paranormality (taking synchronicity as a key example) the book suggests active conceptuality (or pneuma as it is named herein) is the necessary condition for such phenomena to occur. The implications of accepting this kind of ‘substantial conceptuality’ are then variously explored both in relation to paranormality and regular philosophy. The result suggests a philosophy that seamlessly fuses a magickal interpretation of existence with the regular everyday one.”



Audrey Szasz - an experimental concept novel based on the real-life crimes of Soviet serial killer Andrei Chikatilo, who was finally executed in 1994 having been convicted of murdering 52 people


Audrey Szasz, Tears of a Komsomol GirlIllustrated by Karolina Urbaniak, Infinity Land Press, 2020

https://audreyszasz.com/


Tears of a Komsomol Girl is an experimental concept novel based on the real-life crimes of Soviet serial killer Andrei Chikatilo, who was finally executed in 1994 having been convicted of murdering 52 people between 1978 and 1990.

​USSR, Rostov, 1980s. Arina, a young girl — insolent, obnoxious, but most importantly musically gifted, poses as the ideal student — upstanding, hardworking, and a member of Komsomol — the Soviet Union’s Communist Youth League. Fantasising unrealistically about becoming an internationally famous classical violinist, and yet simultaneously behaving as cynically and hypocritically as she can, Arina uses her Komsomol duties as a pretext for strutting unsupervised around town of an evening, fraternising with soldiers and Party bureaucrats alike, compulsively lying to cover her tracks. And yet her sleep is punctuated by obsessive and oppressive dreams concerning a certain killer who’s been on the loose for years — a ruthless, sadistic and thoroughly vicious opportunist referred to in rumours as Citizen X, the Rostov Ripper, or simply Satan — a monster who brutally slays children and adolescents having assaulted them at knifepoint. As the killings become ever more tortuous and frenzied, and the number of innocent victims tragically swells, it’s only a matter of time before Arina finally crosses paths with Satan, and her nightmares turn into a reality.







Audrey Szasz, Destroy Everything You Touch | Infinity Land Press, 2022


This nineteenth-century chateau set in the Swiss countryside within convenient range of the Gstaad slopes also boasts one of the largest private collections of sadomasochistic pornography in the entire canton of Bern. Most of the items I have been invited to view consist of image after image and scene after scene of young women being completely objectified (in terms of their appearance and anatomy), verbally abused, psychologically manipulated and cruelly degraded by older men (and sometimes women) before ultimately being beaten, raped, decapitated and dismembered (although not necessarily in that order).

With photographs by Karolina Urbaniak




Audrey Szasz, Zealous Immaculate, Amphetamine Sulphate, 2022


A major novel of perversity and pleasure from a richly exciting new literary talent. Apparently orphaned in a foreign land engulfed by civil war, Tamara finds herself in an isolated and notoriously mismanaged home for abandoned children.

Initially unable to comprehend the local language, she attempts to communicate nonverbally, having seemingly lost the faculty of speech. Unaware of her parents’ true whereabouts – or whether in fact they are even alive – Tamara struggles to make herself understood and to survive in this alien environment where chaos reigns and brutality – or sheer indifference – unfortunately appears to be the norm.

A sinister cast of characters duly appears, including the glamorous but corrupt Director, her overbearingly sadistic partner the Doctor, not to mention the Father – a perverse cleric with a penchant for cruelty – amongst other unsavoury and remorseless individuals, all enforcing a strict hierarchy between the adults and the children (and thus the perpetrators and the victims of institutionalised violence).

Meanwhile, a number of different voices or alters jostle for psychic dominance over Tamara’s internal narrative; through various temporal shifts, rotations and leaps in chronological perspective our heroine’s journey – both geographical and psychological – is described in a disintegrating arc of obscure recollections, fragmented diary entries and increasingly obscene erotic fantasies.

Conversely, these kaleidoscopic projections, delirious daydreams and compulsive diatribes gradually accumulate to articulate a traumatised inner topography that mirrors the devasted and desolate external landscape of a perpetual war zone….



Szasz’s dark imagination – brutal scenes of cold sadism – is matched by her intimidatingly brilliant writing. Not only that, but Szasz possesses the skill to find the balance between a piece of dazzling experimental writing that is also completely readable in an addictive, page-turning way. —Thomas Moore


Szasz’s writing reads like controlled frenzy, a limpid prose which – antithetically – contains all of the darkness and monsters we refuse to acknowledge. We might even have a genius on our grubby hands. —Steve Finbow


Excerpts:

They told me that my name is Tamara. But maybe it’s not my real name. I can’t remember anything anyway. I don’t even know where my parents are. The Director told me that my parents are dead. She told me that they were shot in the square. In the city. There was a big shooting there. The people were all lined up in the square, and the soldiers who were standing up on the balconies or lying on the roofs of the buildings fired their guns. They shot everyone in the square. Nobody could escape because the army put tanks at either end of the square so nobody could run away. They all got shot. The Director says my parents are dead but I don’t believe her. One day my parents will come and get me. The Director tells me not to worry. She says I am safe now. She says nobody will ever find me. (p.8)

* * * *

I’m basically ignorant and if possible I’d like to keep it that way — illumination is so overrated — and I heard a belt coming down, felt it instantaneously lashing my lower limbs, my thighs, my ass and I didn’t know exactly who was responsible because I was blindfolded and I’d taken too many of those tranquillisers and had too many cocktails and I was probably drooling like an imbecile — I’d been tied to a rocking horse — my tormentors often commented on the youthful innocence of my smile and contrasted it with the perversity of my behaviour — you can put a label on anything but ultimately it’s meaningless — because I am an incorrigible ant in insect time broken burning drowning in the mire of destiny — like all infamous creatures, I have done my share of questionable things — sometimes I feel something approaching shame or guilt — but in reality I have no remorse and after I’ve been particularly cruelly treated I like to examine myself using mirrors — so narcissistic right? — and then they take photographs of me — so we can all remember the contusions that blossom on my skin so brightly, like meadows of lavender in Provence or jacaranda petals inundating the streets of Bulawayo, like a storm of violet confetti — of course they’re precious to me these days, particularly the marks given to me by those whom I love or despise the most and I must like emotionally unavailable people because I scorn intimacy and I have certain needs that must be fulfilled, and I have to select my tormentors carefully just like a designer ponders over their fabrics — yes, I maintain strict criteria and I can’t allow myself to become enslaved to just anyone — not that it would even be possible to give myself away so easily because I have such contempt in my heart for most people — virgo fidelis, my dream childhood, conjuring up images of pink-kneed, dewy-eyed girls trampling wildflowers, across the emerald expanse of lush meadows free from landmines or camouflaged snipers — sinking into cement-grey quicksand — adolescent romance smothered in multiple layers of contaminated sediment — buried beneath various levels of so-called original sin — easing into self-recrimination, day after day — climaxing occasionally — groping soundlessly in the direction of a forgotten sun — and I tell myself that my life ought to have been a bed of roses — on the surface of things — that superficial layer of ice which obscures the depths beneath — I guess it could have been — and it could be yet, in theory — if I could just turn things around — I’m still young, reasonably intelligent, and if I could be bothered, I could probably make something of myself — but anxiety — inexplicably — seizes me, grips my little heart in a vice of trepidation and obscure longing, like a sadistic woman clutching my skinny wrists with her firm hands, clamping them behind my back, or twisting my arms painfully at the elbow, and putting me over her knee, as though I’m still a recalcitrant pupil, an infernal bad girl, who has committed some minor infraction — and naturally, she then goes on to lift my skirt, pull down my tiny black knickers, and having composed herself — I’m wriggling, probably, like a piglet — begins to spank me with unexpected zeal — and if it seems like she’s done this before, it’s because she has — and apparently she likes injured ballerinas, Eastern European waifs, and selective-mute know-it-all brats with black eyes — of course if they happen to look slightly young for their age, it’s a bonus…. (pp.57-59)

* * * *

You would love to tie me spreadeagled on the classroom floor and repeatedly stamp on me until you’ve broken my ribs. You call me ugly, hideous, paint freckles on my face, take me to the dentist and pay him to fix totally unnecessary and unsightly metal braces to my upper teeth that hurt my gums and make me look like I’m twelve years old. Barely literate teenagers, predictably outraged by the provocation that my altered appearance represents, mock me mercilessly and pelt me with KFC whilst subjecting me to a tirade of barely comprehensible verbal abuse. They drag me into the road and I am run over by a big yellow school bus. Then I lie in hospital with my jaw wired shut so I can’t speak and my limbs in plaster. Luckily someone has thoughtfully painted rainbows and butterflies on the walls in an attempt to cheer me up during my convalescence. (p.62)

* * * *

I hate you. I hate you. Why don’t you love me? You think I can’t give you what you want? You think I can’t turn anyone on? I could go out into the street and get torn to shreds by eighty soldiers in one afternoon. I could have them booting my lifeless little corpse around a crater that used to be a supermarket car park, hoofing me into the trash like a deflated beach ball. I could have them crucifying me with a nail-gun in the gutted remains of the National Museum. All I know is suffering — hate and death. That’s all I understand now. It’s my heritage. My birthright. Our collective legacy. Distilled brutality. I enjoy my punishment. I am a filthy little cunt. I don’t know any better. Look at me you filthy whore. Looking at my crushed and crippled hand? You think that’s fucking funny? Maybe a tank should flatten your car when you’re in it, attempting to traverse a junction. Maybe you get shot right through the skull as your engine idles at an army checkpoint. Maybe you get cut down in a terrorist attack and your body and head are shredded by white-hot shrapnel but you survive it all. I really don’t care. (pp.113-14)

* * * *

My name is Minnie Mouse. I squeak incessantly like a little rodent. God told me to gas you then skin your corpse. Your skin so soft, so luxurious. I’d look good as a lampshade. Light of my life. Fire in my groin. Put it inside me. I want to feel it. I need to lose gracefully, like a good sport. I need to step aside. I need a pump-action shotgun and a shopping mall full of unwilling victims. I need a shot of rhythm and blues. Just give me some of that rock and roll music, any old way you choose it. If you wanna dance with me. Takes two to tango. Takes one to know one. One of a kind. One in a million. A million mouths sucking your tits. A thousand fingers flicking my switch. Milk it. Buy it. Love it. Own it. Bought and sold. Used and abused. First hand, second hand, handouts, left hanging, hung out to dry, lay it on the line, somewhere along the line, line them up, knock them down, knock them dead, knock it off, knock some sense into them, a senseless killing, mindless violence, an act of cowardice, a sickening stunt, creaming your pants, egg on your face, scream like a baby, throw your toys out of the pram, eight days a week, in roller-skates, like a pretentious piece of shit. I am stupid and I know it. I am an irredeemably tedious cunt. I am a brat. Just beat me to death with a baseball bat. I would enjoy it. It’s what I want. That would be paradise. I masturbate thinking about it. But I can’t even get close to coming. Nothing will take me all the way anymore. I go to the old people’s home. It stinks of ammonia and excrement. I roll around in their unwashed beds and sniff their linen. It makes me gag and retch and I masturbate hopelessly for hours in futile search of an ever- elusive climax whilst manipulative power-hungry nurses pull on rubber gloves and massage my slender limbs and pour castor oil down my throat until I heave and vomit. It is revolting, idiotic, disgusting, depraved yet utterly banal. I begin to drown in my own sick. I indulge each of my otiose fantasies. I wish the nurse would tie me up so tightly my blood circulation is cut off and then smash a vase over my head and suffocate me with duct tape and a pillow filled with Canadian goose feathers. I wish a mortar shell would land on this building. I wish for air force drones to bomb this town repeatedly for days on end until there is nothing left except a vast lifeless wasteland. A cratered moonscape. I wish for walls of fire to consume this yokel country. I wish a phalanx of marauding cyborgs would stroll through the towns and villages executing any living creature their sensors detect. I hate everyone but I hate myself most of all. I vouch for no one. (pp.131-32)

“Basking like a reptile in your reflected glories. I just respond. Sometimes I don’t even do that. I just do whatever I end up doing. No thought. No plan. No real motive. No overarching theories or philosophies. I can’t even stick to a routine. I lack discipline. Can you give it to me? Can you tell me what to do? Can you force me to do whatever is necessary to survive? From one day to the next, until the very end? Will you give me the beating I deserve? “

“I wish the nurse would tie me up so tightly my blood circulation is cut off and then smash a vase over my head and suffocate me with duct tape and a pillow filled with Canadian goose feathers. I wish a mortar shell would land on this building. I wish for air force drones to bomb this town repeatedly for days on end until there is nothing left except a vast lifeless wasteland. A cratered moonscape. I wish for walls of fire to consume this yokel country. I wish a phalanx of marauding cyborgs would stroll through the towns and villages executing any living creature their sensors detect. I hate everyone but I hate myself most of all. I vouch for no one.”




‘Shut your mouth,’ Mother tells me. I shut my mouth. ‘Wipe that idiotic grin off your face,’ she says. I wipe the idiotic grin off my face. And as I emerge from diazepam slumber I realize that our train has pulled into the station. Pain, invisible, but etched within me like crystal. Welcome to London St. Pancras International, where this journey terminates.



Richard Marshall: BRIEF NOTES ON AUDREY SZASZ: “IF YOU CAN BEARTHIS THEN YOU’LL PASS THE TEST.


Audrey Szasz (aka Zutka) is a London-based writer. Infinity Land Press published her debut in print, Plan for the Abduction of J.G. Ballard (a collaboration with Jeremy Reed) in 2019, followed by her first novel Tears of a Komsomol Girl in 2020. Szasz is also the author of the novella Invisibility: A Manifesto (2020) and a second novel, Zealous Immaculate (2022) via Amphetamine Sulphate.