7/8/14

John Toomey - something of a sprawling segue into Dublin as it’s then to be known to the reader and its excesses are as hilarious and compelling as they are cutting and insightful…a hedonistic pipe dream put down on paper with nothing held back



John Toomey, Huddleston Road. Dalkey Archive Press, 2012.

 
 
In circumstances all too familiar for many of us, Vic meets and falls in love with Lali, only to discover that what attracts him to her is also what will make the relationship impossible. Only Vic's friend, James, seems to have the capacity to figure out what goes on between the two of them, but fails repeatedly to persuade Vic to get out of the relationship. An Irish student alone and lonely in London, Vic sees at first meeting all that he should need to see about Lali, but accomodates himself to her in what will turn out to be an increasingly destructive relationship.
Bereft at the end, with only his daughter to make life at all worthwhile, Vic seems determined to go on, despite not understanding or accepting what has happened between him and Lali. This is a love story played out in the way that many people experience such relationships, without ever having answers to the endless whys they are left with.
 
The Examiner, Alannah Hopkins
"...HUDDLESTON ROAD is a dark story, tightly focused and powerfully told, further proof that Toomey is a seriously ambitious writer...The description of Vic’s downward spiral...is a frightening tour de force...The story is not what distinguishes this novel: it is the bravura of the writing. Toomey has an innovative turn of phrase and a wide vocabulary...a writer and a publisher assuming that there are intelligent adventurous readers out there for intelligent, adventurous novels..." 
Sunday Times Magazine, Alan Murdoch
"...John Toomey's second novel tracks a single narrative thread, following the intertwined life of the teacher and a beguiling north London woman...Toomey constructs a brisk if distant narrative, showing assurance in his characters. He can also conjure up a striking image: the outline of the moored sailing ship the Cutty Sark - "her bony masts naked and wintered" - lingers ominously. He has a special faculty for neatly condensed phrases of charged meaning - "an emotional capitalist", "polite taciturnity", "the astringent privacy of her heart". Episodes of debilitating depression are presented, and last several days...A thoughtful work by an author unafraid of uncomfortable material, with the potential to write large-scale dramas."
 
Books Ireland, Sue Leonard 
“John Toomey is nothing, if not economic with words. His second novel, HUDDLESTON ROAD, fairly rattles along…In these days of long, wordy books, this second novel stands apart. At 182 pages it’s succinct to the point of brevity. There isn’t a lot of dialogue, the tone is one of telling, rather than showing, and the text is stripped so bare, that years can pass in a page. One would think this would be an irritant, and indeed, it goes against perceived writing wisdom, but in this case it works well. And that’s down to the author’s assurance with words. His prose flows, and some of his descriptive scenes are brilliant; so good, that they could compete with those of John Banville. Toomey’s characterisation is spot on too… In the second half of this novel, Toomey explores dark themes…a writer who dares to be different.”
 
Library Journal, J. Greg Matthews
“…this contemporary urban tragedy is a surprising though impressive follow-up [to SLEEPWALKER]…Toomey’s subtle lyricism and talent for characterization are evident…his depiction of the mysterious Lali is particularly affecting.”
HTMLGIANT, Grant Maierhofer
“HUDDLESTON ROAD is first and foremost a departure from that cynicism and mania inherent to [SLEEPWALKER]…shift away stylistically is undeniable; and quite impressive…Toomey has managed to show here a different set of literary chops, while retaining the maniacal attention to detail so prevalent in the first book…each paragraph, each sentence, the importance of this book seems to be that wild attention to detail Toomey seems to have great control over…This is, I’d argue, a love story. There are moments that make it considerably different than most love stories you’ve read and will read, but all the same there are tropes at play here that make this book a fresh spin on the old magic of two people falling in love in spite of terribly difficult circumstances, and the ramifications in both of their lives as a result of this.”

Sunday Business Post, twitpic
“…Toomey’s second novel is a tortured love story about two people who would have been better off had they never met. It’s an interesting premise that Toomey manages to develop well.”

Sunday Mirror, Claire O'Boyle
"Drawn in by the snarling, arrogant charms of Lali, Vic is at her mercy from the start...The intense relationship between a couple who probably never should have met makes Toomey''s second novel an enthralling read."
Grant Maierhoffer"Definitely check both of these books out (HUDDLESTON ROAD and SLEEPWALKER) ...Bizarre, strange, and I found myself nearly-addicted to each while reading up on the author via his website, which features tons of free writing samples and a fantastic blog about process, etc"
Midwest Book Review
“HUDDLESTON ROAD is a novel from John Toomey, telling of Vic, a man pursuing Lali, in a relationship that won't end well for them...Toomey crafts a very real read...An honest, down to earth, and subtly humorous read, HUDDLESTON ROAD is an excellent pick for literary fiction collections.”
Harvard Crimson, By Its Cover
"“Look, Ma, I drew you a picture.” “Very good dear, now why don’t you finish coloring it in?” This is the exchange I imagine when I look at the cover of John Toomey’s new book, whose front displays a pen rendering of what appears to be a brownstone...Although my OCD tendencies are a little peeved that the house is not completely colored in, I still feel like I would read this book—judging from its cover, of course."
 
 
John Toomey, Sleepwalker, Dalkey Archive Press, 2010.
 
Stuart Byrne is a young, beautiful, single businessman who finds his perfect life sabotaged by a growing awareness of his own superficiality.  Nauseated by his own helplessness, struck by a creeping lethargy, Stuart tumbles through a tumultuous week of excess, promiscuity, deception, cowardice, and regret, and in the process manages to trade his slick perfection for a fantastic, and darkly hilarious, catastrophe.  A deadpan comedy about the rather unfunny void in the center of many modern lives, Sleepwalker explores how our trying to fill that void can be just as destructive as ignoring it, and how the world will always let the beautiful get away with murder.
Colum McCann
"John Toomey has the radar tuned to a high frequency... (SLEEPWALKER) is a funny, smart, intuitive book. It captures turn of the century Dublin, the moment when a very new thorn entered the skin."

Michael Adelberg, New York Journal of Books
"...a precocious, dark comedy set in a prosperous suburb of Dublin, Ireland. At first blush, Sleepwalker might remind readers of Roddy Doyle’s early novels, particularly The Snapper. In addition to sharing Doyle’s Gaelic focus, Toomey offers the same downbeat view of family and romance. But he also treads close to the sub-genre of American novels concerning 20-somethings with too much disposable income...Unease with materialism is a pulsating subplot within Sleepwalker. Every car has an improbable, bombastic name (i.e., Pretenzia, Pinacil). Stuart works as an ad-man for a shameless food marketer, and smart-ass commercial jingles pour from car radios...Toomey is a clever social critic with a gift for droll digs at the upper middle class. In addition to high-end cars (noted above), Tomey pokes fun at other indulgences that have become tantamount to necessities. Cell phones are described as a “pandemic,” and Stuart achieves some measure of peace only after he discards his. The move of Stuart’s empty nest parents into a posh new home is described this way: “More space for less people. To a bigger garden, a grander house and a quieter estate, in search of space and privacy went the family who cried out for intimacy and shared burdens.”...It is a darkly funny and very smart book. Toomey could become his generation’s Roddy Doyle—a super-perceptive chronicler of a materially ascendant but troubled generation in Ireland."

John Waters
"Toomey's majestic despatch from the capital of the Republic of Boredom is that rare thing: a novel for our times in an age when novels are generally thought to be a thing apart from reality and its depiction - challenges to other novelists, fancy footwork in the literary Olympics, award fodder, mere entertainment... (SLEEPWALKER) is also a gauntlet thrown down to other novelists, a knowing first foray into the crucible of novel writing, deserving of any shortlist, and hugely entertaining."
Grant Maierhofer at HTMLGIANT, November 2012
“John Toomey’s first novel SLEEPWALKER…an expertly cynical debut; , with all the literary savvy of any of the contemporary masters describing chaos in the city, while retaining an originality that’s marked Toomey as an important presence in contemporary Irish literature.”

Nathan T. Reynolds in Big Muddy, January 2012
"John Toomey’s debut novel, SLEEPWALKER, follows a partial week in the life of Stuart Byrne as he begins to feel he is living a life of meaningless excess and consumption in the Irish cityscape...thought-provoking, dark comedy begins with the Sunday morning after twenty-five year old Stuart’s drunken foray with a strange woman...The story is presented by a narrator to whom Stuart has divulged all his troubles...but the narrator openly admits a level of unreliability. He is “god-like in [his] all-knowingness, but utterly toothless. [He’s] endeavoured to preserve the integrity of what [Stuart] recounted.” He can only retell what Stuart confessed, no more and no less...Toomey’s well-crafted language prevails through the pages as he not only challenges the perceived favouritism of the “beautiful people,” but he also questions what makes a family, established nomenclature...Toomey navigates through all of these issues with precise intent to shed light and provoke thought...(the) narrative is a fantastic look at the struggles and issues within not only Irish society but also society as a whole. Consumerism, loss of faith, meaningless work, and promiscuity all wrapped into the life of Stuart Byrne...Toomey’s masterfully crafted novel is as impactful as it is comical."
Metro Éireann, April 2011
"I had been putting off the reading of this book for some time now...But if I had I would have missed the gem that is SLEEPWALKER...Toomey does a good job of fleshing out the skeleton of the story – the apathy and disillusionment of modern life...It’s...what Toomey calls a “vague feeling of potential unrealised”...This is assisted by a finely aligned story and an array of characters who execute the job with aplomb..."

Shelley Marsden, The Irish World, February 2011
“An intuitive, witty and leftfield debut that really captures turn of the century Dublin...SLEEPWALKER – funny and disturbing in equal measure - centres on the life of Stuart Byrne, a young, good-looking businessman who finds his perfect life sabotaged by a growing awareness of the superficiality of his entire existence... (he) manages to trade in his slick perfection for a fantastic, darkly hilarious disaster...Toomey’s sharp, skilful novel is a deadpan comedy...a deeply intimate, soul-searching book about a person who can’t cope with intimacy at all.”

Glenn Harper, International Noir Fiction, January 2011
“...SLEEPWALKER, by John Toomey, is a comic portrait of an Ireland just poised on the brink of the boom going bust...The writer plays comically with fictional structures like the famous "unreliable narrator," and one of the comic turns concerns the narrator’s intrusions into the story...SLEEPWALKER...is a funny book...and a cold, hard look at a culture on the brink of a disaster. It's published in the U.S. by Dalkey Archive Press, which has a particular interest in comic and off-center fiction around the world.”
Irish American Magazine, December/January 2011
"John Toomey’s debut novel, SLEEPWALKER, is a fable of spiritual decay...SLEEPWALKER is told by a bland yet unforgivingly observant narrator, documenting the downward spiral of antihero Stuart Byrne. Paralyzed with apathy, Stuart handles his successful if mind-numbing career and a series of events in his love life...with exponential ineptitude and helplessness. It is a feat of Toomey’s spot-on black humor and emotional generosity that the superficial and selfish Stuart is neither despicable or pitiable, but deeply familiar."
Midwest Book Review, November 2010
"When you let apathy take control, apathy can take you on quite the ride. SLEEPWALKER tells the story of Stuart Byrne and his dissatisfaction with life, and the adventures he faces in trying to fill that emptyness that is taking apart his soul. One of the beautiful people, he finds that good looks are more than just a perk; they're quite the advantage in society. Thoughtful and humorous, SLEEPWALKER is quite the read, very highly recommended."

Catherine Taylor, The Guardian, December 2010
SLEEPWALKER depicts “A catastrophic week in the life of Stuart Byrne, "uncurious slave to contented indifference", unfolds with comic mock-horror in Toomey's stylish cautionary tale...Then a real, grown-up problem is sprung on him, and Stuart takes refuge in drink, forgetfulness, promiscuity – all propelled by a refusal to engage in the irritating complexities of adulthood. Eventually, even the brisk prose and author's evident fondness for his wayward hero cannot save him from a messy conclusion.”

Rebecca Oppenheimer, a National Book Critics' Circle member, in Howard County Times, December 2010
“In the opening pages of John Toomey's SLEEPWALKER, Stuart Byrne awakens in a friend's guest room with a woman whose name he doesn't know. This is not a terribly unusual situation for Stuart, who seeks to remedy the emptiness of his life with binge drinking and casual sex...SLEEPWALKER is, by turns, funny and heartrending. It is a bleak, finely drawn portrait of not entirely unjustified youthful ennui.”
Lonesome Quill, Levine Copywriting: The Blog, November 2010
“…Toomey isgreat: adept with words, crafting sharp little sentences that carry a surprising amount of emotional heft. His protagonist, Stuart, would be an oaf to know, but on the page he’s compelling and appealing. And Toomey plays a neat little trick of writing an intimate book about someone who can’t handle intimacy…”

Books Ireland (No. 325), November 2010
SLEEPWALKER "...might be described as an existential comedy as it follows one man’s attempts to come to terms with the vacuity of his existence. Told in a tragicomic style, all the action takes place in one week as young businessman Stuart Byrne suffers an emotional and mental breakdown. He attempts to fill the void in his life mostly through sensual indulgence which takes him on a downward spiral of self-destruction. Of course the destruction is accompanied by self-discovery as Byrne comes to grips with his own reality..."
 Twat Bubble, Blog, December 2010
“The Dalkey Archive published some of the most interesting fiction of the year. In ‘Dolly’, by Orly Castel-Bloom...the resulting satire is as grotesque as it is hilarious. John Toomey’s, SLEEPWALKER, invaded and occupied similar territory – the Patrick Bateman styled protagonist lurching from one barely concealed catastrophe to another...”

Kara Rota, Culture Pop, Irish Central, September 2010
“John Toomey's debut novel, (is) about an attractive young guy, Stuart Byrne, who becomes suddenly sickened by his own shallowness and spiritual decay and dives headfirst into some dark attempts to fill the void...Toomey has a strong literary voice, hilarious and also heartbreaking, and I can see why Colum McCann has hailed SLEEPWALKER as “funny, smart, and intuitive.””


You can read an article written by John Waters about John Toomey and SLEEPWALKER, and contemporary Irish Fiction, from The Irish Catholic (see page 6) by clicking this link:
Patrick Skene Catling, January 2008
“The eponymous antihero of SLEEPWALKER is revealed first in a strange bed with a hangover and a girl whose name he can’t remember. At the age of twenty-five, he is a new breed, middle-class Dubliner – charming, well-paid in a boring job with a company car, and entirely devoid of any loyalty and responsibility, even to himself...In this energetically entertaining first novel, John Toomey portrays the ‘somnambulisitic passivity’ of Stuart, Stuey, Stu with malicious glee. The story develops beyond an ordinary promiscuous pub-crawl...In post-modern interventions, the ‘narrator’, beyond the author’s control, assumes an active role and attempts to awaken the sleepwalker to reality. This ingenious complexity adds considerable fresh interest to the novel, and seems to promise a sequel.”

Anne Sexton, Hot Press, July 2008
“SLEEPWALKER, the first novel by Irish writer John Toomey, follows twenty-five year old Stuart over the course of five summer days in Dublin...SLEEPWALKER deals with the problems of a generation “caught between excess and emptiness” and questions the meaning of life in age with no gods, no faith or vocations...SLEEPWALKER is an engaging read as well as a timely work of fiction. The party’s over; welcome to the hangover.”

Sarah Brazil, Irish Mail on Sunday, August 17th, 2008
"Set in an affluent modern Dublin, SLEEPWALKER focuses on grown-up Celtic cubs – a generation of self-indulgent brats...unable to handle reality on any meaningful level...Toomey has produced an excellent first novel that brilliantly captures the disaffection of a culture engulfed in consumerism. His cutting view of modern Dublin and the awkward, meaningless relationships his characters develop really hits a nerve. Definitely a name to watch."
 Western People, October 15th 2008
 "What happens when you have everything you want?...That complex question is at the heart of John Toomey’s SLEEPWALKER, a novel that attempts to probe into the ugly underbelly of a remarkable era in Irish history. SLEEPWALKER is one of the first novels to capture turn-of-the-century Ireland in all of its sordid glory...In many respects, John Toomey has created a character who is not a million miles away from Bret Easton Ellis’ unforgettable stockbroker, Patrick Bateman, in American Psycho. Stuart may be wholly lacking in psychopathic tendencies but he is a brash, egotistical nihilist and his spectacular demise over the course of a tumultuous week is not entirely surprising. John Toomey has produced the first compelling novel in the Celtic Tiger genre..."

 
John Toomey’s first novel Sleepwalker was an expertly cynical debut; something of a sprawling segue into Dublin as it’s then to be known to the reader and its excesses are as hilarious and compelling as they are cutting and insightful. That book is essentially what I think of as a hedonistic pipe dream put down on paper with nothing held back, with all the literary savvy of any of the contemporary masters describing chaos in the city, while retaining an originality that’s marked Toomey as an important presence in contemporary Irish literature.
His second book, Huddleston Road, is first and foremost a departure from that cynicism and mania inherent to the first. I’d argue that fans of the first book will immediately know the author’s work when they begin reading his second but the shift away stylistically is undeniable; and quite impressive. Consider, for a moment, the first books of Jay McInerney, or Bret Easton Ellis, each American authors who began with dark comedic forays into metropolitan chaos. One could argue that McInerney has grown away from this over the years but he’s always retained some of that sensibility, and the same certainly goes for Ellis, ten-fold. Although I’m a tad hesitant to draw comparisons to the first books of either of those writers (of considerably different movements than Toomey) the general point I’m hoping to make is that the writer challenged himself in starting out with such a distinctly-crafted epic as Sleepwalker, and—all the 2nd novel mythos aside—Toomey has managed to show here a different set of literary chops, while retaining the maniacal attention to detail so prevalent in the first book.
It follows a young Irishman named Vic. Vic leaves Dublin for London early on in the novel and through no real preference of his own winds up teaching history and such to teenagers. Again, through each moment, each paragraph, each sentence, the importance of this book seems to be that wild attention to detail Toomey seems to have great control over. A young man standing at a party is never simply that, but an opportunity to explore the ramifications of standing at said party and the physical details of those present and the questions running through young Vic’s mind. At times it reads as a sort of summary of this character’s thoughts and yet the vivid moments of dialogue and scene give striking reality to each moment when you find yourself so ingrained in this character’s reactions to moments that you forget the moments themselves.
Because this will also be an interview, and because I’m hardly interested in giving a moment-by-moment account of the novel’s content, I won’t delve that much deeper into the goings on in Huddleston Road except to address perhaps the most important part: Lali. Lali is a girl Vic finds himself desperately attracted to with every moment that passes. She doesn’t seem interested and even acts like a bit of an asshole at first and yet this draws Vic slightly more to her so that when he’s finally given a chance to sit and speak with her his mind is torn asunder with thoughts and worries and chaos and yet he cannot help himself. This is, I’d argue, a love story. There are moments that make it considerably different than most love stories you’ve read and will read, but all the same there are tropes at play here that make this book a fresh spin on the old magic of two people falling in love in spite of terribly difficult circumstances, and the ramifications in both of their lives as a result of this.

***
GM: There’s a feeling in Huddleston Road where each paragraph is sort of a small narrative all its own, where each sentence goes barreling into the next and the details feel very close to Vic’s perspective. It made me think of early on in the book when Vic forsakes poetry “to record, with meticulousness, the important and, it should be said, the mostly extraneous details of his life,” and I was wondering if you might comment on the style in which this book was written.
JT: I think the style to which you are referring finds its origin in the fact that until the very latest stages of editing the book was written in the first person. It was a decision, late on, to change it to a third person narrative. It was John O’Brien’s suggestion, in fact. I had wanted to write a book that would be inside the head of somebody who really suffered, and was suffering. To show the progression of such suffering, the things people do to themselves, knowingly and willingly, but also, ultimately, to show how people drag themselves out of such experiences. The problem with that was I was also trying to tell Lali’s story, and the first person narrator wasn’t letting me do that in any plausible way. I wanted to write a story about two people, and that’s what the story is, and any experimentation or challenging the conventions only got in the way of the story. So, to be able to see the story from a multitude of angles, I needed an omniscient narrator. But there are, as John O’Brien pointed out to me, more than one kind of omniscient narrator. There’s the omniscient narrator who sees all and knows all and maintains a respectful distance from the characters, and then there’s the one that sees events through the eyes and experiences of a particular character; this one can, crucially, move beyond the narrow parameters of a single character’s vantage point though.
So John O’Brien suggested it, I gave it a go (after much muttering under my breath) and found he was right. More specifically, the story at times provides important information about Lali that Vic simply couldn’t know, or couldn’t plausibly reflect upon. Because if he had known and reflected upon it he would most likely not have been in the mess he was in. It boiled down to the integrity of the characterization really. You ask yourself, ‘Would Vic really say this? Or do that?’
Passages of this book—most of them, in fact—are written in a sort of manic detail, I’m thinking especially of the early descriptions of Lali as observed through Vic. Someone’s hair, though, hardly seems just their hair but an opportunity for exploration both within the minds of the other characters, and for the general reader. Was there distinct intent in giving this lucidity to certain passages balanced against the other, more simply descriptive passages of Vic’s daily life?
There is a sense that Vic’s life, a fairly pedestrian paced affair at best, is suddenly exploded upon by Lali. That’s the sense of the relationship that I had imagined and what I was attempting to create. So I suppose, although I’m not sure how aware I was of that specific contrast, it was what was happening. Simply put, Vic meets Lali and he’s intoxicated. Something about her, that elusive quality that draws one person to another. And initially this is a superficial, or an aesthetic quality – her skin, her hair, her nails, her lips, her chin. The descriptions are part of that style of narrative you already referred to; here’s this omniscient narrator who wants to tell Vic’s story, to show you the story through Vic’s eyes. He has other information he can show you too, but when he’s telling you about Lali, he wants you to see her as Vic saw her. And, for Vic, her psychological deterioration was mirrored by a slow deterioration of her beauty. Or perhaps, as her very person becomes increasingly submerged by darkness, she just appears less beautiful. The light went out of her eyes, she didn’t stand straight anymore, didn’t draw your attention, and so then you begin to notice that she hasn’t dressed, that she looks tired. The vivacious and flirtatious Lali could be wiped out, dead on her feet, but her strident personality made you overlook it. The descriptions of her were supposed to demonstrate how exotic she was to Vic. She was this force, something other, that appeared before him and he was captivated. So that he might be on his way to work, say, when suddenly – BOOM! – there’s Lali! Everything becomes technicolour, vivid, compulsive, excessive. The writing, manically detailed, is a reflection of Vic’s hunger for Lali, his desire to recognize and record every aspect of her. To consume her, even. He’s trying to preserve the moment, constantly, as if he intuitively realizes the ephemerality of it all. As if he’s afraid she’ll vanish if he looks away.
In Huddleston Road the notion of place takes on a role of particular importance considering it’s what propels the book from the beginning, as well as providing a context of expatriation and loneliness for Vic as things become heavier in London. Do you—like many an author from a notable place before you—feel place holds a great bearing over the movement of your stories? Does it provide anything for characters or situations that might otherwise not exist?
Place is significant, absolutely, but not necessarily the fact that it was London. For example, if you’ll allow me some latitude here, in Sleepwalker, Dublin was paramount. Dublin, the governing attitudes, the geography, the topography, the zeitgeist of that now absurd era, was a character in itself. The culture of that boom-time acted on all the characters. And it had to be Dublin, it couldn’t have been anywhere else. However, in Huddleston Road, all that mattered was Vic was not living at home. It didn’t have to be London. It could have been anywhere. What was important was that he was removed from his home, isolated. It is important that when he finds himself miserable on a Tuesday evening that he has nowhere really to turn. Because Vic living at home in Dublin, with the support structures of a place you have grown up in around him, would probably not have accepted the slow belittling effect that Lali had on him. But when you’re by yourself, being out on your own in a new city can cloud your judgment. It can sap your confidence. You become desperate for something to validate your time in another place – imagine leaving a city after years without a single person you might call a friend. Imagine disappearing from a city and not a single person even noticing, after being there years. The place you grow up defines you, in many ways, and it also dictates to a large degree your expectations of life. And for Vic to recreate for himself what he experienced all his life before London – a stable home, a happy place of compromises and goodwill – was never likely to happen with Lali. But his insistence on trying to get that round peg into that square hole frustrates him. It’s a red-herring, a decoy, and he follows it and loses his way. By the time he realizes it wasn’t the thing to do, he’s so enmeshed in Lali’s life that he simply has to learn to live with it. Had he met a girl as capricious as Lali in different circumstances, he might not have been so easily cowed, so easily seduced. He might have been more like James.
You mention in your Acknowledgements section of Huddleston Road the fact that this book has been with you for a very long time. Was this also the case with Sleepwalker? Is there any sort of protocol you follow before actually letting yourself write the book?
In the end, both books took about four years. Huddleston Road slightly longer, perhaps. Five, maybe. There are many reasons for that, from the simple logistical issue of having to do it while working a full time job. There’s a limit to how fast you can work while only having evenings and parts of a weekend to do it. And then there are the less easily identifiable ones. For some reason the process for both has been in and around four years. At least, that’s the point when I could see daylight with each book. I’m not convinced, even if I were in a position to write full-time, that it would happen any quicker. The work needs a gestation period. You need sometimes to leave it lying around the house and seep into the subconscious, into the realms of lateral thinking. Sometimes the solution to some impasse descends upon you while you’re unblocking the toilet, or driving to work. I tend to resolve difficulties with phrasing, with specific sentences or clauses, while doing something entirely different. I think writing needs that time to just sit there, maturing. That’s what I mean by saying I’m not sure even if I had the time that it would be done any quicker. It’s just that if I had more time I’d be less tired when I’m doing it.
As regards a process, after two novels I’ve not identified a pattern. I tend to know where a book will end and not much more than that. Characters tend to assert themselves early in the process and that can dictate where the book goes. But I really enjoy the nitty-gritty, the line editing and the shifting paragraphs about, and whole sections, and seeing what happens. It can be a real slog towards the very end, but I really enjoy all that. It’s a kind of sadomasochism. I tend to get the draft, the rough structure and the story down as quickly as possible and edit and stylize after that. One of the problem with Huddleston Road was I tried the reverse of that – I wrote and read back and re-read and edited as I went. I would always do that but with Huddleston Road I had in mind that I would have each part so well written that editing afterwards would be a much quicker process. It wasn’t, and, in fact, it made it more time-consuming. Because one of the advantages you have of writing a draft where nothing is pinned down and then coming back to it is that you can see the whole. And when you step back you begin to see the problems, the dead-ends, more clearly, as well as the opportunities to take the story a different way. You can’t do that when you’re in the thick of it. So as a result of my running with this erroneous theory, I spent a lot of time was chasing dead ends, spending days on paragraphs that never made it into the book.
Writing without any concrete plan means you’re probably better off getting the story down and shaping and aligning it after. It’s the illusion of coherent thought that we’re after. I haven’t actually developed a method is what I’m saying. It’s a bit haphazard. The best I seem to be able to do is clearly establish where it is going from the outset. I know the ending. I can see the final scene very vividly. You write towards that end, but with no precise idea of how to get there. You circle it, and probe blindly, catch glimpses of it from time to time; like trying to catch an apple bobbing in water with your teeth. Then the moment arrives, eventually, when I see the end is within grasp and duck my head for the apple and bite in. It’s like skeet shooting, maybe; you wait for it to cross your sightline and then you pull the trigger.
Being an author who’s penned what will certainly be called first and foremost a “love story,” though very much a contemporary slant on that theme, I wondered if you had any comments on the merits of this mode of boy-meets-girl, etc., and the possibilities for making it new—as you have, quite well I might add—in years to come?
It’s a love story, alright. I’ve no problem with it being described as such and I’ve no grand ideas regarding what I have or have not done as far as the conventions of the genre goes. I’m not much into genre or defined forms. Form is fitted to a given narrative, I think, rather than the reverse. You subvert the conventions when the narrative you have in mind cannot be served via the conventional. You don’t challenge the conventions unless you need to. Huddleston Road is a love story, I think. And there’s nothing particularly unusual about, I don’t think. The questions is whether the readers will buy into the story, will they invest in the characters? That remains to be seen.
That’s the way I see it, at least. And love stories are compelling stuff. We shouldn’t let the triteness of so much that is classed love story shut us down to the possibility of a good one – The Great Gatsby, Great Expectations, Anna Karenina, etc. It’s our most basic interest really – how two people meet, negotiate each other and how it all works out, or doesn’t. And I’m not for a minute suggesting any comparison between me and the authors of the aforementioned titles, but the trick is, I feel, to create compelling characters. That’s what I’m getting at here. Characters that the reader wants to know more about. And sure, once you’ve done that, these things, if properly conceived and executed, will naturally drift into a kind of social commentary, they will illustrate and make observations about the time they are written. But it’s the love story, not the social commentary, that keeps the reader reading. So then the story achieves both contemporary relevance and universal appeal.
But it’s all about characters, and the readers, and how those two get along. They don’t have to like them, these characters, but in my experience the reader lets you put them through all sorts of horrific stuff so long as the book’s characters have that innate integrity. As long as they are plausible as people. They don’t have to behave as you or I would, or be pleasant in any way, but they must be plausible.
The only thing I’ll say about the kind of love stories I write is that they’re all about love gone bust. And that’s because it’s infinitely more interesting than happiness. Sleepwalker was a love story too, of course. In many ways. It’s just that  none of the love was reciprocated. It was a story yearning for love that could never happen. And that’s beginning to sound a lot like Huddleston Road, when I put it like that. The Edge, from U2, once said something along those lines about U2 – that every time they go into the studio they go in to make the same album. The thing that makes you write is a desire to tell this story that speaks of who you are. In your mind you have a perfect story. You’ll never write it, of course, but that’s what keeps you coming back. You’re trying to express something that speaks for you, that captures some essence of all you believe and feel. It’s unattainable but it is also a compulsive force. I think Faulkner described the dilemma of the writer being that, “The work never matches the dream of perfection the artist has to start with.” But it’s because you never quite achieve it that you keep returning.
You mentioned in our correspondence the comforts of writing with the “world-weary cynicism” present in your first book, Sleepwalker, the presence of which results in a cozy sort of matter-of-factness in that novel. There’s some level of this matter-of-factness at work in Huddleston Road, I’d argue—though certainly not as cynical—that left me far more engrossed in the moments and personally involved; whereas with Sleepwalker it was more entertaining to sit back and observe. Any intent or preference you’d like to discuss there?
Sleepwalker became comic, or satirical. It didn’t start out that way. It was early in the editing stage of Sleepwalker that I realized that Stuart was not a tragic figure, but a pathetic figure. He was spineless and cowardly and amoral, and when a character comes off the page like that the only way to handle him is with comic gloves. Whereas Huddleston Road is a book that is not avoiding the intimacy, though the characters are. It is aiming to strike directly at the heart, to move and evoke pity and anger and sorrow and heartbreak. The difficulty with this kind of book is that if it doesn’t work, and ultimately the readers will be the judge of that, it’s in very grave danger of coming off naff, or trite. You run the risk of being slammed, frankly, when you don’t hide behind cynicism and satire. It seems to me that one of the defining differences between British and American fiction is that British fiction is afraid to be seen to be taking itself too seriously, so it’s all satirical and cleverly ironic. As much as we like to see ourselves as different on this small island, we’re still demonstrably more British than we are American. We’re maybe a touch less emotionally retarded than the stiff upper lip, the gallows humour, the flippancy of British fiction, but not much. Writing this sort of thing, a straight love story, is in that sense a little out there. American fiction, by and large, seem to do a better job of taking the nuclear family apart and getting at the heart of the matter. But you can overdo all this earnestness too, and that’s where the British come in. Sometimes all you’ve got is laughter, and you just have to find it in among all the shite. That’s why I’m glad, for all it’s ‘seriousness’, that Huddleston Road is a short book. There’s only so many pages of this kind of stuff that a reader can endure. We shouldn’t take advantage of the reader’s patience and generosity. Not entirely, at least.
It’s a fairly ambiguous question to ask a writer, I’ll grant that, but considering the close proximity in which your first two novels have been published, and the already-existent massive slew of writings available on your site (I’ve begun reading through your essays and find myself just as engrossed and delighted as in the fiction) I wanted to ask what one might hope to expect from John Toomey down the road? Do you see the novel as an area still holding much interest? Collected essays, perhaps?
The novel is the only thing. The only thing, to my mind. I know we’ve been announcing and re-announcing its inevitable decline now for quite some time, and that it is under immense pressure from TV, cinema, music, video games and all sorts of fast-food pleasures but it can still do things that none of those mediums can, in my opinion. No other form can penetrate the vagaries of the human heart and mind like the novel. Nothing illuminates the human experience with such completeness. Nothing else even comes close. This is why the film is never as good as the book – because words and the infinite variables in how they are arranged and interpreted present and evoke a plethora of images and ideas simultaneously. And each reader brings their own distinct vision. I mean, I can see Lali in my head. I know what she looks like, but I can assure you that that is not what you imagine, and a third person will bring a whole other vision of her into being. But if you put her in a film, well then the interpretation has been made by the director, by the casting people, and it’s very hard to get over that once it’s there in front of you. So the novel is everything. I’ve heard other writers talk about how their first love was film, or music or poetry, or whatever, and I always think, ‘Well, why don’t you do that then?’ Life’s short, it really is, do what you want to do.
The essays keep me match-fit, that’s their purpose really. And the odd Blog or half-arsed short story. I find the writing of a novel requires, in the first instance, long tracts of time stretching out in front of me – weeks, months during the summer. During term-time I find it difficult to maintain any momentum with the novels, so I try to keep myself going with these smaller pieces. But I’m not sure if they’re any good. I have them on the site with a view to showing people something, with a view to creating a body of work. But I’m at the beginning of the process. But that said, most of my day is spent teaching English, correcting English papers and trying to find ways to explain to people how you write, how to identify what is missing from a sentence and so on. And this is important to writing too, and my writing informs my teaching. It must. By virtue of having struggled through the writing of two novels I’ve learned things I would hope I can pass on.
I realize I’ve wandered off script again but let me make one more point and hope it creates that illusion of coherence that I mentioned earlier. I write knowing I have been published, at least twice, and that that must mean that at the very least I was capable of seeing a project through and that it was comprehensible to some audience, however small. In the absence of a publisher, which I accept is always a possibility, I will continue to write novels. Because it is how I filter my feelings, my thoughts, my beliefs, my values. It’s how I stay sane. It is my vocation. Not necessarily my job, obviously, but it is my vocation. It is the work that gives my life meaning. It is not for other people to decide that value, it’s a private matter, between me and my writing. Its value to me is mine to declare. And it’s not so much that I foresee my novels not being published, it’s that I comprehend the reality of the situation. I’ve written two novels and have been lucky to find, first in Somerville Press and now in Dalkey, two publishers who like what I have done. And although I count Andrew and Jane Russell at Somerville, and John O’Brien at Dalkey, among my friends, for that is what we have become, they run businesses. If the next thing I produce is rubbish they won’t publish it. So, while a work is still in production, while the writer still writes it, nothing is certain. When I finish the third, I’ll hand it over. And there’ll be an interminable and painful wait while they read over it, assess it, before coming back to me. They might say, ‘No.’ They might say, ‘Look, John, we like you but this one is off-the-wall.’ Or that it’s not as well written as what they had from me in the past. ‘Shop it around, by all means,’ they may say, ‘but it’s just not for us. Sorry.’ That has to be a distinct possibility. I live with that and have learned to write anyway. You write knowing that what you write may never make it further than a few kindly editor’s desks, who agreed to give it five or six pages on the strength of a mutual friend, but ultimately end up on their sizable recycling mountain. So, it’s novels all the way for me, whatever happens. There will, of course, be essays and short stories, too, along the way. But I think I might be finished with the Blog. I did that mainly to keep myself in the minds of potential readers and used my Facebook page to tell people a new one was posted. But somewhere in the middle of last summer I just became entirely disillusioned with that aspect of it. I was boring myself, and I really dislike Facebook, the whole inanity of it. And even though I was using as a promotional tool, I thought, ‘Who actually cares what I’ve put up?’ People aren’t going to my website because they saw it on Facebook. People who want to find me can google me and find my webpage very easily. Those who want to do that can do it. So I gave up on the Blog and I think, although I’ll never rule it out entirely, that it is retired.
Not being a Dubliner myself—though an avid fan of Joyce and Beckett—and considering your position as both a native, and a professor of English in Dublin, I was hoping you might expand beyond the two Irish namesakes of world literature and mention any scribes you feel haven’t gotten their proper due, globally.
Let’s start with the whole Professor thing. I couldn’t venture to talk of myself as a professor – I’m about two qualifications away from that. In terms of English all I’ve got is a BA degree and my experience of writing. I teach to teenagers, High School. So in terms of academia, I’m no bigshot, let’s put it that way. Depending on which group I’ve taught, if you asked them they might say I was a good teacher. That’s as confident as I’d be in those terms.
Secondly, as a reader I’m what the English comedian, Eddie Izzard, termed – thinly read. I came to all this literary stuff comparatively late in life. I always enjoyed English, or at least I did in my late teens. But I barely read at all until I was in University doing my English degree. So I was 21 before I started really reading, and I’m a slow reader at that. I’m in a state of perpetual catch-up. That said, not to down-play my credentials too much, I’m always reading something these days. If home alone, the TV would only go on to watch a soccer game, or something specific. I’m into Homeland right now. I watch that but otherwise I’d be more likely to fall asleep in my bed reading a book or sit down at the PC and do some writing of some sort. So I’ve been immersed in books for, say, 17 or 18 years, but I’m hamstrung by my late start.
So Beckett and Joyce. Beckett first. What I know of Beckett is what I studied in university, five plays or so. What I can say of Beckett is that although I’m no expert I find something profoundly human, and disturbing in his work. It’s the real deal. There’s something about the bleakness that is both heartbreaking and absurd. I’ve liked and found things in any Beckett play I came across.
Joyce? I’m even less of an expert. I’ve dipped in and out of Ulysses over the course of this last 17 or 18 years. While I enjoy certain parts and have a passing interest in theoretical discussions about his work, I’m not sure reading the whole thing is something I’m ever likely to achieve. As a very young man in university Dubliners was among my set reading. I didn’t enjoy it, but as I’ve alluded to already, I was in my infancy as a reader and it might just have been a case of me coming to it too early. Certainly there are other examples of books that I read and was simply unable for at the time and then upon reading them in more recent years I’ve realized that. So I reserve all judgments, or I temper them. I’m slow to criticize any other writer because I can’t help feeling that it might be just that I’m not sufficiently developed as a reader to appreciate the work. I’m particularly cautious in this way when commenting on the big guns of literature. On the few occasions when I have stuck my head above the parapet, I’ve regretted it. I’m not sure I’ve got the intellectual equipment to be casting aspersions on anybody else’s work.
As regards cotemporary Irish writers, I’m not among any literary set or group or community, if one such thing exists here, and only a few names come to mind. But I’m sure that’s more a reflection of my limited reading than anything else. Colm Toibín’s The Master, Colum McCann’s books – Dancer in particular – I’ve really enjoyed. Also Kevin Barry’s style of writing, his short stories, but I’ve not yet got round to a novel of his.
Beyond that, I don’t know what to tell you. My tastes are a mix of British and American fiction, although my association with Dalkey has brought me into contact with translations – Kjersti Skomsvold’s The Faster I Walk and Joao Almino’s The Book of Emotions the ones that stand out. Really, my reading is quite eclectic. I tend to follow the path one step at a time. A love of Martin Amis in university lead me to Julian Barnes and Bellow, which in turn lead me to Philip Roth and more recently  Updike. And these authors led me to Flaubert and Kafka, whom I don’t enjoy as much as they do, evidently. But that’s very much how I read. I read a lot of interviews with authors I like. I’m really interested in talking about writing, how it happens, why we do it, and hearing what others say about it. I consider myself some to be the runt cousin of these guys, rather than their equals. I’m so distantly related that any genetic predisposition to writing has been cruelly diluted.  I name-check them here just by way of acknowledging that these are the names that have influenced me, either through their own work or where their work has led me. - Grant Maierhofer

   SHORT STORIES
RUBY (2012) 
SLIPPING (2011, a novel in progress) 
SAD EYES, CROOKED CROSSES (2010, a novel in progress) 
 
ESSAYS ETC

THIS IS THE WAY by Gavin Corbett (2014) 
IMPOSSIBLE OBJECT by Nicholas Mosley (2014) 
THE FOLDED LEAF by William Maxwell (2013)
BLOG ARCHIVES (pre-May 2013) 
THE GAMAL by Ciarán Collins (2013) 
 
at
Labels:

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Lionel Erskine Britton - a drama from 1930. in which a giant Computer is set up in the Sahara to run human affairs according to ambiguously Utopian tenets.

  Lionel Britton, Brain: A Play of the Whole Earth , 1930 A Brain is constructed in the Sahara Desert -- presently It grows larger than the ...