12/22/23

Mary Kane - A collection of little stories that brim with the tiny, specific details of a moment -- the cups, the shoes, the scarves, the books -- and the humor, tenderness, uneasiness, sadness, and wisdom that define entire lives

 



Mary Kane, In the Book I'm Reading, One Bird

Books, 2023


A collection of little stories that brim with the tiny, specific details of a moment -- the cups, the shoes, the scarves, the books -- and the humor, tenderness, uneasiness, sadness, and wisdom that define entire lives.


 “It’s not often that I encounter a book that makes me a better reader. But as I read Mary Kane’s In the Book I’m Reading, I entered the book (and the books within the book … and the lives of both the author and her subjects … and her breathless, magnetically poetic prose) so thoroughly that I came away changed. This collection of tiny stories relies on both the universal (which made me feel understood) and the unique (which showed me a new way to look at the world). It made me laugh, broke my heart, thrilled my brain. I’m both a better reader and a better person for it.”— Lauren Wolk, NYT bestselling author of Wolf Hollow, Beyond the Bright Sea, Echo Mountain, and My Own Lightning


“This book knocked my socks off! Unique, readable, relatable, funny, profound: Mary Kane’s stories brilliantly evoke the wonders and absurdities of life, and the ways we are both their source and their subject.”— Lisa Madsen Rubilar, whose award-winning stories include “Obbligato,” “Bathing Mother,” and “A Confession”


“These little stories are like the TARDIS – bigger on the inside. They brim with the tiny, specific details of a moment – the cups, the shoes, the scarves, the books – and the humor, tenderness, uneasiness, sadness, and wisdom that define entire lives.”— Rebecca Siegel, poet and cofounder, Literary North


“I’d never thought of reading let alone existing as counting wild turkeys in the dark, but this book showed me the light. A unique collection of delights, In the Book I’m Reading captures the beauty of the solitary reading life in a way I won’t soon forget.”— Peter Orner, author of Still No Word from You, Last Car Over the Sagamore Bridge and Am I Alone Here? Notes on Reading to Live and Living to Read


Adore this book!: I have read it and reread it and reread it yet again. Mary Kane's idiosyncratic writing style reveals her penetrating and sympathetic understanding of human nature. She tosses delicious bon bons into her reader's lap with her references to favorite authors: Camus, Tolstoy, Proust, Mann, Kierkegaard!

Failure is a delicious treat, as is Nude Descending and Cusp. I wish we had a molar-shaped table just like that on the book cover. Her insights into marriage are hilarious because they are not only intimately personal but universally understandable. The mysterious Mr. Leopold's surprise appearances, cats everywhere, fear of poetry — it’s all compelling, intriguing, and very much alive. And funny!

The Joys of Reading resonates because I have trouble retaining information, and have to jot down things I want to remember.

I have enjoyed and reveled in Mary Kane's short poems and stories for several years now, and "In the Book I'm Reading" collects her most delightful and insightful pieces. I'm buying copies for all my reading friends.

Kindle Customer: I read this book of fifty-one micro fiction stories in manuscript form before its publication a year or so ago and then read it again now. The longest of the stories is 9 pages, the shortest one sentence. It’s the kind of book that subtly seeps into your bones. The kind of book you find yourself thinking about months later. I was surprised to discover that my memory of a conversation with my sister about the end of a friendship was in fact one of these stories.

I called it micro fiction, but really Kane’s writing defies the pigeonholes of genera. It’s meta fiction, stream-of-conscience, short fiction, and just the plain love of language. Some are a snapshot of one moment, while others explore the nature of memory, ageing, and marriage and relationships in their ordinary middle. I don’t think its hyperbole to call In The Book I’m Reading a kind of magic in the way it quietly takes hold of the imagination.

Amazon Customer: Mary Kane’s short story collection, In the Book I’m Reading is genuinely unique, a distinction I give to few books I’ve read. Each of the stories in the book takes no more than minutes to read, yet each one packs a punch. Each one is an adventure—you never know where you’ll end up. Over and over, I would ask myself, “How did she think of that?!” But in reality Kane has captured the strangeness, the multiplicity, the absurdity, the holiness and the hilarity of life as we all know it.

Kane’s powers of description are stellar; for instance, the past has “thick shoulders all hunched, teeth in need of brushing, desires growing out all over its body like bent wire sculptures.” And she has a way with creative comparisons, as in, “He sliced the zucchini into thin wheels, enough wheels for an entire traffic jam of miniature automobiles.” The story “Cusp” convinced me that marriage is indeed, in all its details, like “a giant tooth.”

In fact, marriage is a major theme in this collection. Spoiler alert: many of the stories are linked, and feature the same long-married couple. The identity of Mr. Leopold hides in plain sight. The family cat also plays a recurrent role (“Big Cat,” “Animal Behavior”). So does the act of reading, as the name of the collection suggests. I love the way Kane represents an imaginative mind in communication with the minds of other writers. The narrator doesn’t just “read;” she slips into the worlds of her books, just as they enter hers; and it’s sometimes hard to tell the difference (as in “Tent,” “The Joys of Reading,” “Rilke, 2007, At Shaw’s”).

I continually found myself amazed at Kane’s sheer virtuosity with language. The story “In Service,” for example, is a single, effortless sentence that lasts two pages. But Kane’s stories are much more than linguistic dexterity. The stories are quixotic (“The Problem”), meditative (“Osmosis”), and often FUNNY (“A Sad Tale,” “Georgina Lloyd-Atkinson”). Sometimes I laughed out loud ( “New Old Couple”). Sometimes I felt sad (“Influences and Edibles,” “Roy Rogers, Where Are You?”) Some stories left me with a sense of awe (“Portrait,” “Love Story,” “Spider,” “Lamp,” and many others). Often as I reached the end of a story, I simply whispered, “Wow!” This is a book I’ll keep on my shelf to read again and again.

senzel: It will make you laugh and cry and question reality and wonder. The stories are tiny but there is so much in them. Mary Kane is a writer of beauty and genius. With great style and humor, her narrator makes the world disappear. If the whole world knew this little volume, it would be a calmer, happier, and more confused place.

Melissa Weidman: "In The Book I'm Reading" intrigues at first sight - a beautifully-drawn molar poses on the cover like a dressed-up celebrity (spoiler alert: it may actually be a piece of furniture, not a tooth). This gem of a book (are they stories? Poems? Dreams?) draws the reader into an alternate universe of words/images and how they signify. Surprising, gorgeous, provoking, revelatory, hilarious, profound, Kane's delectably skillful use of language provides a reading experience you won't want to end and will never forget!  [amazon.com reviews][


Esther Yi - a Kafkaesque fever dream about fandom and obsession, arrives right on time . . . Haunting yet playful, immersive yet unreal, Y/N is a brilliant dissection of consumption in all its forms—how we consume art, and how it consumes us

 
Esther Yi, Y/N: A Novel, Astra House, 2023


It’s as if her life only began once Moon appeared in it. The desultory copywriting work, the boyfriend, and the want of anything not-Moon quickly fall away when she beholds the idol in concert, where Moon dances as if his movements are creating their own gravitational field; on livestreams, as fans from around the world comment in dozens of languages; even on skincare products endorsed by the wildly popular Korean boyband, of which Moon is the youngest, most luminous member. Seized by ineffable desire, our unnamed narrator begins writing Y/N fanfic—in which you, the reader, insert [Your/Name] and play out an intimate relationship with the unattainable star.

Surreal, hilarious, and shrewdly poignant, Y/N is a provocative literary debut about the universal longing for transcendence and the tragic struggle to assert one’s singular story amidst the amnesiac effects of globalization. Esther Yi’s prose unsettles the boundary between high and mass art, exploding our expectations of a novel about “identity” and offering in its place a sui generis picture of the loneliness that afflicts modern life.


"Strange, funny, and at times gorgeous . . . Full of characters that squirm and run together, as if the reader were trying to decipher an out-of-focus eye chart, the book evokes how precarious identity itself can be . . . Yi displays a keen sense of irony; her oneiric, ceremonious writing has the consistency of a poem put in a blender with an academic paper."—Katy Waldman, New Yorker


“Y/N resists the junkiness of the internet . . . against which a well-formed novel like this counteracts, a blast of cleansing heat.”—Alexandra Jacobs, New York Times


"My definition of an unputdownable book . . . witty, astute, and self-aware."—Melissa Broder, Guardian


"Rare . . . magically recursive . . . [Y/N] is the opposite of 'Own Voices' identity fiction (a label recently entered into the official list of categories of literature); it is a novel concerned with humans as Other, of love as distance, of language as foreign, and of beauty as reproduction."—Olivia Kan-Sperling, n+1


“This book is so good it’s hard to believe it’s a debut novel . . . Take what you think about boy bands and dial it up to 11. For the first half I was laughing to myself, writing haha in the margins, and I noticed at a certain point I had stopped laughing because I was thinking so deeply . . . [Y/N] is short but so deep, so meticulously crafted. After I finished it I wanted to start over.”—MJ Franklin on the NYTBR Podcast


"The most adroit depiction of celebrity and parasocial relationships I have ever read. Bizarre, confidently so, yet observant and abounding in humanity and humor, every sentence is a surprise."— Tochi Onyebuchi, NPR (Best Books 2023)


"[A] savage story about a young woman's rapturous descent into our modern-day religion of celebrity worship, fanfiction, and ubiquitous parasociality. The girls who get it, get it."—Delia Cai, Vanity Fair


"Much mainstream writing about K-pop in the West . . . [is] chipperly respectable and pretty boring . . . In contrast to the standard narratives, Y/N is less interested in demystifying a cultural phenomenon by creating a legible justification for why someone becomes obsessed; it simply throws readers down the hole of obsession in all its fevered absurdity . . . Y/N is more freakish and hallucinatory than your average satire."—Cat Zhang, Vulture


"This debut novel, a Kafkaesque fever dream about fandom and obsession, arrives right on time . . . Haunting yet playful, immersive yet unreal, Y/N is a brilliant dissection of consumption in all its forms—how we consume art, and how it consumes us."—Adrienne Westenfeld, Esquire


"Y/N is an utterly brilliant, shining, and mesmerizing debut that will make you rethink everything you know about fandom, celebrity, and parasocial relationships."—Tamara Fuentes, Cosmopolitan


"Stunning . . . Strange, haunting, and undeniably beautiful, [Y/N] shines."—Publishers Weekly (Starred)

"A surreal quest that seems tailor-made for the present moment . . . [Y/N is] a heady, immersive journey into musical fandom and cultural dislocation."—Kirkus Reviews


"Yi's comic style is an anarchic, many-layered thing . . . You start to suspect that, far from being a snarky satire of fandom, her novel may be lampooning the pretensions of literary fiction . . . Unlike the formulaic pop material she animates here, Yi has fashioned a novel that is witty, self-knowing, and, extraordinarily, far beyond categorization."—Robert Collins, The Times (UK)


"This is a curious, cerebral work, shot through with moments of tender poetry and a vertiginous self-awareness."—Nina Allen, The Guardian


"Y/N is frighteningly, coolly adept at vivisecting experiences of fandom obsession without suggesting it is above them . . . Luxuriously indecipherable . . . Y/N’s aphoristic surface is precarious, flexible, never going so far as to yield the pleasure of making sense. Rather, it dressed me down; sliced me open to reveal the clean emptiness of a floating, futile state of existence."—Trisha Low, Tor.com


"Yi is an inventive writer, eschewing labels, genres and, most certainly, expectations."—Terry Hong, Shelf Awareness


"[A] bracing and brilliant debut . . . [Y/N is] a funny, surreal, and rousing search for the unattainable that reaches beautiful heights of absurdity, paranoia, and existential panic."—Colin Winnette, Electric Lit


"In this sharp and humorously perverse novel, Yi examines the sort of identity-altering, obsessive fandom that is only destined to disappoint if one looks too closely."—Emily Park, Booklist


"[A] remarkable debut novel . . . [Y/N is] a dizzying mix of so many things but ultimately unlike anything else."—Jason de Stefano, UChicago News


"Surreal and stylish . . . That Yi navigates such weirdness with stylized precision and authorial purpose is a testament to her profound talent. This is a short book, but undeniably significant, a destined-to-be-classic."—Miles Doyle, Commonwealth


"Y/N is a funny and deeply original meditation on love, devotion, and spirituality, and one need not be familiar with the world of K-pop fandoms to enjoy Yi’s brilliant prose . . . [this] is a book that demands to be read and reread."—Angela Hui, 48 Hills


"[In Y/N,] love and obsession are at odds, placed against a backdrop of an intense K-pop fandom, a balance Yi strikes flawlessly . . . With Yi’s clean prose, it’s easy to see the slippery slope from fan to obsessive adorer at the expense of self."—Hannah Ryder, West Trade Review


"Yi’s debut is weird and whimsical, transcending reality the way many a K-pop music video attempts to, finding escapism in the pursuit of something as unattainable as the Moon."—Tamar Herman, Mekong Review


"Y/N is one of the most daring novels of the year. Yi has set a new standard for internet-influenced literature by showing that online and literary narratives exist hand in hand, creating the world with every word."—Eric A. Ponce, Bookpage (Starred)


"A fascinating and complicated depiction of how we create and assert our identity."—Michael Welch, Chicago Review of Books


"Esther Yi’s debut is absurdly funny, brilliantly surreal and wildly unique. It speaks to 21st century technosocietal conundrums of celebrity obsession, loneliness, voyeurism, media and consumption."—Karla J. Strand, Ms. Magazine


"[A] witty, worldly romp into a subculture of boy bands, fanfic, and online parasocial relationships."—Patrick Rapa, Philadelphia Inquirer


"[A] lyrical debut . . . Yi’s novel takes on a surreal, almost hallucinatory atmosphere that blurs the line between what is real and what is imagined."—Enica Davis, Library Journal


"Y/N dissolves the differences between low and high art in pursuit of larger social questions about fulfillment, desire, and devotion . . . Y/N recognizes fandom and fanfiction as indicative of modern society’s deficiencies––and invites discussion about the ways in which obsession, devotion, art, pleasure, and dependency manifest in modern life."—Regan Mies, Necessary Fiction


"Y/N is a fast paced debut full of intriguing sentences and apt-observations steeped in humor. Fans of millennial fiction looking for a palette cleanser will gravitate towards this novel which takes us on a surreal journey of modern desire."—Kiran Gill, Open Letters Review


"Please take this blurb as me dropping [this book] in front of you with . . . urgency."—Katie Yee, Literary Hub


"Surreal and stylish. Yi delivers an absurd, but also grounded, expose on internet obsession. It’s almost like the book-version of Ingrid Goes West. You’ll belly laugh, cringe, cry, and at the end of the day connect with Yi’s main character."—Adam Vitcavage, Debutiful


"Yi’s absurd, hypnotic, and very funny novel is about obsession, sublimation, and weird as hell fanfiction about Moon, a boy from the book’s BTS stand-in. Very much Being John Malkovich energy."—Arianna Rebolini, Reading Habits


"[Y/N is] winningly weird and doesn’t waste your time, which makes it better than most new novels, just right off the top."—Phil Christman, author of How to Be Normal


“Sumptuous, precise, and full of pulsing, startling life, Yi captures with finesse the rhythms of internet voyeurism, the corporeality of parasocial desire, and the very heartbeat of contemporary longing.”

—Alexandra Kleeman, author of Something New Under the Sun


"Bold, audacious, and stylish, Esther Yi is a marvelous writer who reminds me of Yoko Tawada and Marie NDiaye. Esther Yi takes our contemporary human culture, dismantles it, and makes it into something new. The clarity of her absurd vision is singular and important."—Patrick Cottrell, author of Sorry to Disrupt the Peace


"Crisp zeitgeist setups within a transnational now—Esther Yi's sharp, sculpted paragraphs beat with a hilarious demonheart that'll make you cry. I loved it."—Eugene Lim, author of Search History


“Esther Yi’s debut novel reads with decisive, alarming confidence, in a prose style that’s both intellectually rigorous and playfully perverse. Yi has a preternatural sense for the ways we speak past each other, locked as we are in the whirlpools of our own devotion—Y/N reveals the unexpected places desire can lead us, if only we are willing to lose ourselves.”—Larissa Pham, author of Pop Song


"Esther Yi's every paragraph is revelatory, unexpected, with an intense capacity to see the world anew, such that we are empowered again in the matter of astonishment. I admire her work so much."—Rick Moody, author of Hotels of North America


12/21/23

Margarita Perveņecka - "a story that is inextricably intertwined with a number of scientific disciplines such as molecular biology, chaos theory, organic chemistry, crystallography, genetic engineering, and string theory. Besides that, it is also one of the weirdest novels I have ever read."

 


Margarita Perveņecka, Aspirantūra [Graduate

School], 2023



A long-awaited new work by Margarita Pervenetska is difficult to read or use for some other, as yet unaddressed need, but for the comfort of the reader, we can say that writing it was obviously no less agonizing and humanly impossible process. Stylizing a scientific method of clarifying the world and oneself, the author has created a comprehensive cosmo-psychological puzzle that can be scrolled from practically any place, looking at a random place or reading in the opposite direction, thus avoiding the paralyzing feeling that "you don't understand anything" and attempts to "separate back" and " read it again' only makes it more complicated. You can start small, you can pay attention to the texture, read with a sense of touch, tasting the rough sophistication of the text and the roughness of the easily flowing sentences. Observing what kind of books people are reading in public transport recently – a manual of life strategy models, a collection of formulas for the cosmic structure of the soul and similar tools for applied brain vivisection – I would like to recommend that you also try to put this novel in the outer pocket of your everyday backpack. For relaxation. [by Google translate]


Ever since I first learnt about C. P. Snow’s lecture The Two Cultures and the heated debate around it, I have been fascinated by the possibilities offered by any text or work of art that could bridge the notorious gap between the sciences and humanities. I truly believe that the great literary masterpiece of the twenty-first century, as paradigm-shifting as Joyce’s Ulysses, will be written by someone who would combine a profound knowledge of maths and science with virtuosic stylistic capabilities. So far, out of all the authors who have tried to bridge the gap, Thomas Pynchon has proved to be the most accomplished and persuasive. The blending of scientific discourse with the literary, historical, and social contexts both in Gravity’s Rainbow and Against the Day is nothing short of a triumph in taming the two cultures. We shouldn’t forget, of course, that Pynchon is in the rare position of having a background in both: before joining the Navy, where he was trained as an electrician, he had two years of studying engineering physics at Cornell under his belt, whereas, upon returning to the university, he switched to English and graduated with a humanities degree. We can also find the creative recourse to scientific ideas in the works of Tom Stoppard, Don DeLillo, Richard Powers, David Foster Wallace, and probably a dozen more other authors for whom science plays more than just a decorative role. A combination of stylistic mastery and a deep understanding of scientific concepts which we find, for example, in Gravity’s Rainbow, is an especially rare thing. It is quite often the case that the sense of style and the knack for sophisticated writing are outweighed by the inability to understand scientific concepts or, inversely, scientific expertise stumbles upon utter helplessness when it comes to style and diction (think of all the terrible sentences produced by scientists who became Sci-Fi authors). Perhaps the most telling recent example of a famous writer of fiction deliberately seeking to immerse himself into science for the benefit of his work was Cormac McCarthy, who was associated with the Santa Fe Institute for more than thirty years and had an opportunity to learn about cutting-edge scientific research directly from the likes of Murray Gell-Mann. McCarthy’s last two novels The Passenger and Stela Maris, which were conceived and written in the environment of intellectual cross-pollination fostered by the interdisciplinary think tank in New Mexico, are yet another addition to the growing body of literary works attempting to bridge the gap between the two cultures. Compared to the majority of fiction published every year, there are very few novels that seriously engage with scientific ideas and go beyond the simplistic metaphors of pop-sci bestsellers by incorporating the respective technical vocabulary that is likely to scare off nine out of ten readers. I am always on the lookout for a such novel because it promises to teach me something new and, possibly, lead me somewhere beyond the ordinary, the historical, and the political—to some compelling realm created at the crossing points of scientific and humanist pursuits. The Latvian author Margarita Perveņecka’s massive philosophical science fiction novel Graduate School fits the bill perfectly for me. This book, which required many years of labour and was finally published in 2023, seems to be equally inspired by Roger Penrose’s The Road to Reality and The Tibetan Book of the Dead. Behind the black cover modestly adorned with a cross-section of the Calabi–Yau manifold, one will find a story that is inextricably intertwined with a number of scientific disciplines such as molecular biology, chaos theory, organic chemistry, crystallography, genetic engineering, and string theory. Besides that, it is also one of the weirdest novels I have ever read. It has passages so densely packed with specialised jargon as to become borderline glossolalia for a layperson, and, on the other end of the spectrum, there are moments of mind-numbing domestic mundanity which work like nails on a chalkboard. But, in addition to those, there are poetic passages of filigreed wordsmithery and depictions of transcendental visions that take one’s breath away. At its darkest moments, the narrative delves into episodes of eye-searing cruelty and depravity, along with shocking surreal vignettes that the reader is unlikely to forget. The novel as a whole is a huge puzzle that does not give away its secrets readily and requires multiple readings. During my first reading, it was barely comprehensible, and only when I finished a re-read, I picked enough connections to make sense of what actually goes on although I cannot claim a complete understanding, and many things that I have to say about Graduate School are the product of my interpretation.
The main setting of the novel is an alternative version of Earth that saw major technological advances much earlier than we did. In that fictional world, space travel and genetic engineering were made possible already in the 19th century. The novel begins in the future, probably some 300 years from now, but, as things develop, we get more glimpses of the events which took place in the 19th, 20th, and 21st centuries. The society of the future is highly stratified, with the technocratic elite whose name I would translate as “alphanumerics” (ciburi) at the top. The highest echelon of the alphanumerics resides above Earth and holds the political and economic power over its inhabitants. It is not entirely clear where exactly these rulers live, so my best guess would be some kind of advanced space stations orbiting the planet. The alphanumerics regard consciousness as a biochemical product that can be modified in different ways and transferred from one body to another. A total opposite of the materialist ruling class is a small apolitical group of menticulturists (prātkopji). As the name suggests, these individuals are dedicated to the nurturing of their intellectual and cognitive abilities; in fact, they do little else as the mind is both the tool and the object of their contemplation and exploration. The most accomplished menticulturists also live above the planet guiding their earth-bound disciples called aspirants, those who aspire by the rigorous and continuous mental practices to rise to the level of their mentors with the ultimate goal of leaving the material world altogether and blending in with the universe of pure Platonic forms. Immediately below the alphanumerics is the large community of the holists. We do not learn that much about them except that they have been responsible for integrating the scientific achievements of both the alphanumerics and the menticulturists in a new education system. Then follow the lowest: those who never progressed beyond undergraduate studies and therefore are limited to a rather dull existence of satisfying their basic needs. Having a Bachelor’s diploma or its analogue is not enough to make it in this learning-obsessed meritocracy. However, the lowest are not at the very bottom of society as their name may suggest. The truly lowest place is reserved for the dregs (padibenes), people with either rudimentary education or no education at all who live in densely populated communities; their concerns never rise above the first step of the Maslow pyramid.
The main characters of the first part titled The First Transcendental Equation: Vector Solution are vaguely humanoid individuals each of whom is designated by the letter V with a number next to it, like a vector component. In most cases, they are alone in a classroom attacking some problem on the blackboard covered with a thin film of some enigmatic substance. These problem-solvers are aspirants engaged in their daily pursuit of menticulture. They are often referred to as “personalisations” of certain vector components, which makes us think that their consciousness gets transplanted from one synthetic body to another. With time, it becomes apparent that the main actors of the unfolding drama are V24 and V2, both of whom, at different time periods, acquire the mysterious apartment No. 7 in the building of the former post and telegraph station that also used to house the SCCC (Space Communications Coordination and Computation) office. It takes V24 almost 11 years of hard work at an electronic data archive to earn enough money for the down payment. By the way, in this future world, all currencies are tied to the oscillations of energy generation and consumption and are measured against the universal monetary unit called ergob, which corresponds to one bit of energy. Ironically enough, at some point in the future, all V2 has to do to buy the same apartment is to breathe for thirty minutes into the tube of an energy conversion device at a bank terminal. V24 is the only employee at the archive, and his main task is to retrieve and restore as much information as possible from the heap of centuries-old hard disk drives using mathematical modelling on his hybrid computer. The archivist’s findings are of utter importance because they help us to fill in some gaps regarding the past of that civilisation, especially the crucial events that took place at the end of the 19th century and the beginning of the 20th. It is thanks to the newly restored electronic files that we get our first view of the Auror Empire, which reached the heyday of its scientific development under the rule of Auror III before being dismantled by the regime of the obscurants, ardent opponents of menticulture, whose rule consigned to oblivion many technological achievements of the empire. The opening of the Space Communications office was one of the many technological breakthroughs during the reign of Auror III, who also converted the military port Aura into a “science town” with the biggest space observatory in the world. At the same period, the preparations for the first interplanetary expedition began. The post and telegraph building that has aroused the interest of the two aspirants turns out to be an important node.

- read more here:

https://theuntranslated.wordpress.com/2023/12/21/graduate-school-aspirantura-by-margarita-pervenecka/



Margarita Perveņecka (1976) is a Latvian playwright and writer. In 2001, Perveņecka graduated from the Latvian Academy of Culture with a BA in film and theater, and since then has been publishing her writing, working for various creative platforms, and writing screenplays. Her first collection, All the Trees Have Gone, was published in 2006. Perveņecka has written several plays for theaters 
in Latvia: Ludwig’s Project was directed by Dž. Dž. Džilindžers in 2004 for Daile Theatre; orget-Me-Not Sausage Paper was performed at the TT Theatre (titled Ņezabudka Vulgaris, directed by Lauris Gundars, 2002); Civil Chain was produced at ACUD Kunst Haus in Berlin (directed by Inga Rozentāle in 2002). Her writing stands out with her unusual ways of perceiving the world,
her use of scientific terms, internationalisms, neologisms, and other peculiar and poetic mean


12/19/23

Hugh Kenner - Wide-ranging enough to encompass Buster Keaton, Charles Babbage, horses, and a man riding a bicycle while wearing a gas mask. Kenner seeks the causes and outcomes of man's ability to simulate himself (a computer that can calculate quicker than we can) and his world (a mechanical duck that acts the same as a living one)

 


Hugh Kenner, The Counterfeiters: An Historical

Comedy. Dalkey Archive Press, 2005

 

Wide-ranging enough to encompass Buster Keaton, Charles Babbage, horses, and a man riding a bicycle while wearing a gas mask, "The Counterfeiters" is one of Hugh Kenner's greatest achievements. In this fascinating work of literary and cultural criticism, Kenner seeks the causes and outcomes of man's ability to simulate himself (a computer that can calculate quicker than we can) and his world (a mechanical duck that acts the same as a living one).

This intertangling of art and science, of man and machine, of machine and art is at the heart of this book. He argues that the belief in art as a uniquely human expression is complicated and questioned by the prevalence of simulations--or "counterfeits"--in our culture. Kenner, with his characteristically accessible style and wit, brings together history, literature, science, and art to locate the personal in what is an increasingly counterfeit world.



For 20 years now Hugh Kenner has been publishing books. (14 of them — the latest reviewed on Page 7) and essays (hundreds) for an audience that hasn't yet been born. How else can we account for the insipid reviews, the slow sales, the indifference of his colleagues?

Two are historical comedies, as he calls them, original contributions to under standing our own minds and deliciously funny—“The Stoic Comedians” (1962) and “The Counterfeiters” (1968). The critics were not amused. I did not review “The Counterfeiters” (1968). The critics were not amused. I did not review. “The Counterfeiters” for the simple reason that I drew caricatures for it, designed the cover and jacket and therefore felt myself disqualified as an objective re viewer. Nor did The Times review it. I am making up for both omissions. “The Counterfeiters” is a lesson in how to see. Not how to see surfaces but the inside of things and the astounding affinities of things which heretofore seemed to have had nothing to do with each other. Vaucanson and Yeats, for instance (but who is Vattcanson?), metaphysical poetry and Babbage (but who is Babbage?), Bus ter Keaton and Alan Turing (but who is Alan Turing?). Whereas the people who appear so strangely unfamiliar in “The Stoic Comedians” have at least the names of people we have heard of in other contexts (Joyce, Beckett, Flaubert), the people in “The. Counterfeiters” are only half familiar. Swift appears along side the English mathematician Alan Turing, who in turn introduces us to the Victorian wizard Charles Babbage (in ventors, respectively, of HAL in Clarke and Kubrick's “2001: A Space Odyssey” and the Difference Engine, which became the electronic computer).

Mr. Kenner has brought all these curious things together—Andy Warhol, Lemuel Gulliver, the Royal Society, Vaucanson's automata, the Jacquard looms, bad Augustan poetry, mathematicians, comed ians—because they are points which when connected make an intelligible and unsuspected picture of reality. In fact, they belonged together as they occurred; history is a secret process. That is why Mr. Kenner, disclaiming his obvious and superb skill as a critic, once called him self an X‐ray technician. He knows how things work. Where other critics can do a masterful job of disassembling an organism and displaying its parts neatly labelled, Mr. Kenner points to the work ing parts in place. “The Counterfeiters” is a history. It begins in the 17th century, when man was being redefined. Descartes said he was a machine we still believe that. Swift said (tongue in cheek) that man was a rational animal; we still try to believe that. Language began to be plain and sensible (how else can you write science and philosophy?), and we still believe that language should be plain and sensible. But something hap pened because of which we can't really believe any of these propositions. That is Mr. Kenner's subject.

For the world long ago ceased to make sense. We do not expect to hear sense from politicians or the pulpit, from the university professor or the TV set. Our economic system seems to be from the brain of the Mad Hatter, our daily lives seem to be the work of inspired and over worked devils, and science is beyond us. The French philosophers tell us we are absurd; the mathematicians say that they can duplicate our brain with a computer.

Mr. Kenner traces some of the lines of force that removed us from the Augustan world of sense and order to our world of nonsense and disorder. Science itself is part of the story; Swift's was the first voice to note that the language of science when applied to man changed our con cept of humanity and that a man operat ing under the strict guidance of empiri cism can end up a naive inhuman prig— Lemuel Gulliver, who found the perfect man and discovered that he was talking to a rational horse. So much for the ra tional animal.

That talking horse of Gulliver's was a counterfeit man. Mr. Kenner constructs his book out of many attempts to counter feit man. Art does it all the time, and so Mr. Kenner gives us an account of how the arts took up forgery in the 18th century; Defoe forged two notable counterfeits that have become and re mained models for the novel; Swift counterfeited his “Modest Proposal” and “Gulliver”; Pope invented a new kind of satire that looked like serious poetry. That is, the man of sense found the mask more useful than the naked face, and history then did away with sense al together (as the satirists predicted) and put sensibility in its place.

Mr. Kenner's book is written at a time when we have not emerged from that age of sensibility. We haven't yet learned to discern things for ourselves again, and thus (as Romanticism taught us all too well) we depend on theory, opinion, preju dice and enthusiasm. That is, we need a counterfeit response, whether to the arts or to the conduct of life itself. Told how to respond, we respond. Art is in spiring and transcends reality, but what do we do with a Campbell's Tomato Soup can offered by Mr. Warhol as a piece of sculpture? Mr. Kenner goes back to the Greeks to explain that. And in the process he Must talk about Abraham Cowley, Wordsworth and Joyce, sensibly, always sensibly.

Sensibly, and vigorously. In Mr. Ken ner's prose, grace cooperates with ener gy; and the energy is so economically compressed that every sentence contains the matter of another man's paragraph. Two civilizations meet in this tense, swift prose: the classical deference of urbane intelligence (Cicero, Plutarch) and the un adorned plain English of the 18th century, the last age to polish the language (Pope, Swift). The tophat dignity of Victorian English (in which the TLS is still written) is nowhere in Mr. Kenner's prose, nor is the drone of professorial sincerity nor the lacquered official prose in which it is thought fitting to cast books about literature and art. If there is a better writer of discursive English alive, I don't know him.

The apparent public neglect of Mr. Ken ner's work is partially due to the demand he makes on his readers. He is always original, usually startling, and radically different from the received ideas already carefully pasted to a subject. That is, he is always inviting us onto unfamiliar terrain. And he assumes that his readers are intelligent. And that they are imagin ative. And that they are interested in literature, as well as its place in the world. (The truth is that the large part of Mr. Kenner's colleagues are interested in a little bit of literature in which they have invested the whole of their wits and are living off the interest.)

It is therefore perhaps too early to re view “The Counterfeiters.” It looks like science fiction to the half‐educated and like fiction to the conservative scholar. A generation (when? where?) that doesn't know that literary criticism is supposed to be dull and flat‐footed will embrace it as a magic book. - Guy Davenport

https://www.nytimes.com/1972/03/26/archives/hugh-kenner-xray-technician.html



The north American critic Hugh Kenner, who has died aged 80 following heart problems, produced some of the most perceptive accounts of literary modernism. Much of his knowledge was gained at first hand, by following Ezra Pound's injunction "to visit the great men of your time". Pound provided the letters of introduction, and his pupil embarked with unrelenting zest on his grand tour, later described in The Elsewhere Community (1998), which also contains Pound's definition of modernism as "simple words placed in natural order".

Thus Kenner befriended the titans of the movement: TS Eliot, Samuel Beckett, Wyndham Lewis, William Carlos Williams, Marianne Moore, Basil Bunting and Louis Zukofsky. The only one he could not get to was Ernest Hemingway, because it would have meant a separate trip to Cuba.

Despite his wanderings, Kenner retained an unswerving fidelity to Pound, whom he promoted as the central presence in modernist writing. At a time when Eliot was enthroned as the monarch of contemporary letters, Kenner argued that the era had, in fact, belonged to Pound.

Though he made his case effectively, it was inevitably regarded as unconventional and tendentious, since the dedicatee of Eliot's The Waste Land was being held as a prisoner in St Elizabeth's hospital for the criminally insane, just outside Washington, DC. He was detained there, from 1946 to 1958, on a treason charge, for making radio broadcasts in support of Mussolini from wartime Italy.

In 1948, Kenner, who had been born in Peterborough, Ontario, visited Pound in St Elizabeth's with another Catholic Canadian, Marshall McLuhan. McLuhan, later best known as a communications scholar, had mentored the precocious undergraduate to a bachelor's degree (1945) and a master's (1946) at the University of Toronto, and had written the introduction to his first book, Paradox In Chesterton (1947).

At McLuhan's prompting, Kenner left Toronto for Yale, where he took a doctorate in 1950 under the supervision of Cleanth Brooks, the leading light of American new criticism, with its emphasis on text rather than biographical and historical background.

At a time when what Kenner called "thickets of misunderstanding" kept Pound at a distance from most critics and professors of poetry, he took it upon himself to brush them aside. During one summer holiday, he returned to Ontario and spent six hours a day for six weeks writing The Poetry Of Ezra Pound (1951).

His labour of love was published by New Directions Press, a small firm founded by Pound's old pupil and friend, James Laughlin. It established Kenner's reputation as a major scholar, and did much to rehabilitate Pound's literary reputation. As Laughlin put it, Kenner got Pound "listed on the academic stock exchange".

A job at Santa Barbara College (now the University of California, Santa Barbara) followed, as did another couple of dozen books - on Joyce, Eliot, Lewis, Beckett and others, many of them still the strongest in their fields. Dublin's Joyce (1956) and Joyce's Voices (1978) were succeeded by Ulysses (1980), still in print and seeking to make Joyce's complex masterpiece understandable.

Kenner adapted his critical style to suit the particular author under scrutiny, following Dr Johnson's observation that literary criticism must be regarded as part of literature or be abandoned altogether. His work avoids academic jargon, and draws on a massive range of influences, seeing connections and parallels in unlikely places.

In a Los Angeles Times review, Richard Eder said of Kenner's proactive approach that "he jumps in, armed and thrashing. He crashes [literature], like a partygoer... You could not say whether his talking or listening is done with greater intensity."

Kenner's magnum opus is unquestionably The Pound Era (1971), the result of two decades of research. This encyclopaedic critical biography explicated the notoriously difficult poetry of Pound and his contemporaries with lively authority.

It begins, for instance, with an evocative account of a 1914 encounter between Pound and Henry James in London: "Toward the evening of a gone world, the light of its last summer pouring forth into a Chelsea street found and suf fused the red waistcoat of Henry James, lord of decorum, en promenade, exposing his Boston niece to the tone of things." Kenner's book dealt with Pound's literary genius knowledgeably and carefully, and sympathetically revealed how such a mind could be duped by the vile ideology of fascism. Kenner himself deplored such politics.

In 1973, he left California for Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, where he remained until 1990. A post at the University of Georgia brought him once again to a more temperate climate, and he remained there until his retirement in 1999. He did not receive US citizenship, and found it amusing to be a perennial "resident alien".

As a student, Kenner had been faced with a choice between writing and mathematics; his grandfather was a skilled mathematician, and his parents were classics teachers - the local school in Peterborough is named after his father. A childhood illness had left him partially deaf, and he took to reading copiously, reckoning to have covered most of the University of Toronto syllabus by the time he matriculated.

However, science and technology remained important, and he wrote A Guided Tour Of Buckminster Fuller (1973), an engaging account of the American techno-transcendentalist thinker; Geodesic Math And How To Use It (1976), on the theory behind Fuller's celebrated dome structures; and Chuck Jones: A Flurry Of Drawings (1994), on the creator of Bugs Bunny and the Road Runner, arguing that Jones had invented an art that was as precise and technical as any other. In 1984, he even wrote a user's guide to the Heath computer, one of which he built himself.

When I met Hugh Kenner last summer, he was dressed in a stripey, light-blue suit, with a bow tie and glasses slightly askew. Even then though, the quickness and sensitivity of his mind were evident. He recited long passages from memory, and told anecdotes of Tom, Sam and Ezra. When I mentioned that I had come from London, his face registered the vivid recollection of a gone world.

The Pound Era had been dedicated to the memory of his first wife, Mary Josephine Waite, with whom he had three daughters and two sons. A year after her death in 1964, he married Mary Anne Bittner, with whom he had a son and daughter; she and the seven children survive him. - Jon Elek

https://www.theguardian.com/news/2003/nov/28/guardianobituaries.books


Hugh Kenner (1923-2003) was perhaps the greatest Anglophone literary critic of the 20th century: no other figure has been so instrumental in our understanding of modernism and its key figures, or so crucial to the development of new ways to think about new literature. He was that rare thing, a critic whose writing is so deft and mind so vivid that his criticism attains the condition of poetry; in that sense, he must be ranked beside Benjamin, Coleridge, and Goethe. He also wrote a book-length study of Chuck Jones cartoons, an introduction to geodesic math, and one of the first user's manuals for personal computing. Kenner taught at UC Santa Barbara, Johns Hopkins, and the University of Georgia.

Jean-Pierre Brisset realizes that a close phonological analysis of spoken words will demonstrate that the French language, and therefore the human species, was evolved from frogs.

 

Walter D. Redfern, All Puns Intended: The Verbal Creation of Jean-Pierre Brisset. Routledge, 2001


"The 19th century in France spawned numerous 'fous litteraires, one of them being Jean-Pierre Brisset (1837-1919). An individualist among individualists, he dismantled the existing French tongue, reshaping it to suit his own grandiose purposes, which were to explain afresh the development of human beings (from frogs) and of their language (from croaks). Continuous and ubiquitous punning was a unique feature of his writing. In this study, Redfern examines such themes as the nature of literary madness, the phenomenon of deadpan humour, the role of analogy, and the place of institutional religion in Brisset's creative rewriting of the creation."


Brisset had been a good soldier, and he was a model railwayman: there was no hint during the working day of the oddity of what he was up to after hours... The fact that frogs turned out to speak what was easily recognizable as French seems at no point to have fazed Brisset, and since the original human language has willy-nilly to be universal, all other known languages must be capable of being derived from French, which was pleasing news for a Frenchman. (John Sturrock Times Literary Supplement, 18 January, 2002, 41)

What indeed can one make of this autodidact who mused about etymology without mastering Latin and about human origins without reading Darwin? Brisset can readily be dismissed as arrogant, Gallocentric, sex-obsessed or simply unreadable. Yet Redfern finds in his work a splendid proof of the instability of language, and also a fine pretext for learned digressions about puns and myths and free associations and what Ponge called ‘amphibiguité’... The main pleasure given by this book actually comes from Redfern’s own style, which is intelligent, energetic, quirky and never too self-indulgent. (Peter Low New Zealand Journal of French Studies, 24/2, 2003, 51-2)

Redfern’s treatment is interesting and wide-ranging, but interesting because it is wide-ranging. (Stephen F. Noreiko French Studies, LVII.2, 2003, 255-6)


‘Brisset had been a good soldier, and he was a model railwayman: there was no hint during the working day of the oddity of what he was up to after hours... The fact that frogs turned out to speak what was easily recognizable as French seems at no point to have fazed Brisset, and since the original human language has willy-nilly to be universal, all other known languages must be capable of being derived from French, which was pleasing news for a Frenchman.’ — John Sturrock


‘What indeed can one make of this autodidact who mused about etymology without mastering Latin and about human origins without reading Darwin? Brisset can readily be dismissed as arrogant, Gallocentric, sex-obsessed or simply unreadable. Yet Redfern finds in his work a splendid proof of the instability of language, and also a fine pretext for learned digressions about puns and myths and free associations and what Ponge called 'amphibiguité'... The main pleasure given by this book actually comes from Redfern's own style, which is intelligent, energetic, quirky and never too self-indulgent.’ — Peter Low


‘Walter Redfern ... a particulièrement raison de s'appuyer sur les travaux les plus sérieux de ces dernières années pour situer enfin la place de Brisset et l'impact de ses ouvrages parmi les créateurs littéraires de la fin du XIXe et de la première moitié du XXe siècle. ... Un bonne bibliographie sert d'appui à cette monographie intelligemment projetée.’ — Jacques-Philippe Saint-Gérand


‘Redfern's treatment is interesting and wide-ranging, but interesting because it is wide-ranging. He shows that Brisset has interested a lot of interesting people, then sums him up: 'Brisset is a trampoline: to take off from and to come back to.' I think he is half right: one may be glad that he existed to provoke this book.’ — Stephen F. Noreiko



Jean-Pierre Brisset as an antidote to the anthropocentric structuralisms of Saussure, Lacan, and Chomsky. Brisset maintains that human beings are immediately descended from frogs. He supports his claim with exhaustive linguistic analyses. Our speech, he shows, is a hypostasis of frogs' croaking in the mudflats; our writing conserves the traces of their obscure hatreds, jealousies, and battles. Brisset, much like McLuhan, affirms the tactility of language, its oral and aural density, its rich, viscous materiality. He "puts words back in the mouth and around the sexual organs." Language arises out of orgasmic screams and bodily spasms. There's no clear dividing line between body and thought, or nature and culture, just as there is none between the water and the land. Language and sexuality are not the clean, abstract structures the so-called "human sciences" have long imagined them to be. Rather, they are forces in continual agitation in the depths of our bodies. --DOOM PATROLS, Chapter 4, Michel Foucault, Steven Shaviro [1995-1997] via http://www.dhalgren.com/Doom/ch04.html



Born into a farming family of La Sauvagère, Brisset was an autodidact. Having left school at age twelve to help on the family farm, he apprenticed as a pastry chef in Paris three years later. In 1855, he enlisted in the army for seven years and fought in the Crimean War. In 1859, during the war in Italy against the Austrians. After he was wounded at the Battle of Magenta, he was taken prisoner. During the Franco-Prussian War, he was a second lieutenant in the 50e régiment d'infanterie de ligne. Taken prisoner again, he was sent to Magdeburg in Saxony where he learned German.

In 1871, he published La natation ou l’art de nager appris seul en moins d’une heure (Learning the art of swimming alone in less than an hour), then resigned from the Army and moved to Marseilles. Here he filed a patent for the "airlift swimming trunks and belt with a double compensatory reservoir". This commercial endeavor was a complete failure. He returned to Magdeburg, where he earned his living as a language teacher, developing a method for learning French, which he self-published in 1874.

Brisset became stationmaster at the railway station of Angers, and later of L'Aigle. After publishing another book on the French language, he undertook his major philosophical work, in which contended that humans were descended from frogs. Brisset supported his contention by comparing the French and frog languages (such as "logement" = dwelling, comes from "l'eau" = water). He was serious about his "morosophy", and authored a number of books and pamphlets put forth his indisputable substantiations, which he had printed and distributed at his own expense.

In 1912, novelist Jules Romains, who had obtained copies of God's Mystery and The Human Origins, set up, with the help of fellow hoaxers, a rigged election for a "Prince of Thinkers". Unsurprisingly, Brisset got elected. The Election Committee then called Brisset to Paris in 1913, where he was received and acclaimed with great pomp. He partook in several ceremonies and a banquet and uttered emotional words of thanks for this unexpected late recognition of his work. Newspapers exposed the hoax the next day.

In 1919, Brisset died, aged 81, at La Ferté-Macé.

Posthumous reputation

The Complete Works of Brisset were reprinted by Marc Décimo, Dijon, Les Presses du réel, 2001. In an essay entitled, Jean-Pierre Brisset, Prince des Penseurs, inventeur, grammairien et prophète, Dijon, Les presses du réel, 2001, Marc Décimo has given a biography, explanations about Brisset's delirium about frogs as ancestors of humankind. Translations in several languages (European languages, Wolof, Armenian, Arabic, Houma, etc.) can be found in this book as well.[citation needed] It also includes the major texts written about Brisset by Jules Romains, Marcel Duchamp, André Breton, Raymond Queneau, Michel Foucault. In 2004 the Art of Swimming (as a frog) was published in paperback.

Around 2001, Ernestine Chassebœuf wrote several letters to French politicians, universities, railway stations, library directors, psychiatric hospitals, to suggest they name a street, a university, etc. after Brisset. Their answers were published on a website dedicated to him,[1] but there is no "rue Jean-Pierre Brisset" yet. Thanks to a bequest to Jules Romain, an annual dinner in his memory was made possible until 1939.

Brisset is listed as a saint on the 'Pataphysics calendar. His writings were in print as of 2004.  -Wikipedia



when they elected old Brisset Prince des Penseurs, Romains, Vildrac and Chennevière and the rest of them before the world was given over to wars Quand vous serez bien vieille remember that I have remembered, mia pargoletta, and pass on the tradition—Ezra Pound, “Canto LXXX”

In January 1913, French papers announced that a little-known seventy-six-year-old philologist and philosopher named Jean-Pierre Brisset had been voted the “Prince of Thinkers” in an election organized by the recently founded Society for Ideology. He had solidly beaten out the better-known, second-place candidate, Henri Bergson. A ceremony was arranged for April of that year. Coming into Paris, the great man was met with a solemn reception at the Montparnasse train station, where a young girl presented him with flowers on the platform and the assembled crowd was treated to a poem that Charles Vildrac had written especially for the occasion. After an intimate lunch, Brisset was brought to the Pantheon to offer a few choice words by the foot of Rodin’s Thinker.

He subsequently met with members of the press, including reporters from Le Figaro, Le Matin, and Excelsior, and then headed to the Hôtel des Sociétés Savantes to deliver a public lecture in which he explained that Man had descended not from apes but from frogs, and that proof of this could be discovered by a close examination of ordinary language, in which the history of our species, along with the mysteries of God and of the world, remained encoded.1 Human speech is the book bound with seven seals described in Revelation, and Brisset himself was the seventh angel who had broken the final seal and revealed its contents. The words we use today still register our initial reactions to moments of great import in the course of our divinely orchestrated evolution—the moment when humans’ amphibious and asexual ancestors discovered their incipient genitalia; early acts of violence destroying the peace that once existed between animal and man; the experience of good and evil and encounters with angels and demons (who were also our ancestors, a middle stage of development between Man and frogs).

Though Brisset’s books had revealed the secrets of God and Man deduced through his analysis of the French language, he had emphasized in his La science de Dieu ou la creation de l’homme (The science of God or the creation of man) of 1900 that God’s language is equally audible in all current languages and he was not claiming any special status for his own national tongue: “The present work cannot be translated in its entirety, but each language can be analyzed by following the Great Law and the methods presented in this volume. The result will be the same: The creation of man, both as animal and as spirit.” - Kevin McCann

https://www.cabinetmagazine.org/issues/50/mccann.php



The big news: or how man descended from the

frog 


After having been a pastry chef, a soldier then a professor of modern languages, Jean-Pierre Brisset (1837-1919) belongs to a line of enlightened poets, creative and eccentric theoreticians who never lose their seriousness. In 1900, he intended to reveal the origins of the human species and of language in a new Gospel which he printed in a thousand copies and distributed free of charge: The Great News. He reveals the Great Law hidden in speech and, through the play of homophony, forges a surprising conception of human evolution: man is descended from the frog. His enterprise did not fail to be praised by the surrealists and by Jules Romains, Max Jacob and Stefan Zweig who awarded this “literary madman” the title of “Prince of thinkers”. [by Google translate]



The Science of God: Or the Creation of Man


Is there an intelligent, living power, having its own, invariable will, real and constant authority and power over individuals, families and peoples? —We can boldly assert that there is no question more important, nor one which deserves to the same degree to occupy the mind of the intelligent man.

Now, to this question we can answer with absolute conviction and certainty: Yes, this power exists; yes, there is a God or a creative spirit, elevated above all human intelligences and whose power extends to all the stars and to everything that lives with its own or general life.

The result of a selection made from the funds of the National Library of France, Collection XIX aims to introduce classic and less classic texts in the best editions of the 19th century.  [by Google translate]


James Elkins - Experimental novel, told in dreams and photos, with 150 images, diagrams, equations, and sheet music(playable on piano). The unhappy story of a person pursued by dreams of burning. It's intended to break new ground in the use of images and narrative.


James Elkins, Weak in Comparison to Dreams, The Unnamed Press,  2023


"Weak in Comparison to Dreams... is the most courageous and fascinating debut I have read since Mark Z. Danielewski’s House of Leaves." –Full-Stop


For years, Samuel Emmer has monitored bacteria levels in drinking water for the small city of Guelph.

He is content to focus on dangerous life-threatening single-celled organisms as his grasp on his own life recedes—and with it, family and friends. To be sure, it is more than a little surprising when Samuel learns that he has been appointed to the city’s Zoo Feasibility Committee. Even more so, that he is being tasked with interacting not just with animals, but human beings. His assignment: travel to zoos around the world and gather information on the stereotypical behavior of animals in their enclosures—the city of Guelph aspiring commendably, if naively, to a cruelty-free habitat for its animals. It is in Tallinn, Estonia, that the dreams start for Samuel. He is in a vast wooded landscape; there is a fire burning in the distance; and it is coming his way…

Weak in Comparison to Dreams, by the historian and art critic James Elkins, is like no other novel you have ever read, even as certain inspirations, from Sebald to Tokarczuk, are clear. With an astounding breadth of knowledge and playful courage, Weak in Comparison to Dreams reignites our love for the ambitious novel with experimentation that never lacks intention, and whose empathetic scope explores the deepest aspects of our individual humanity.



Experimental novel, told in dreams and photos, with 150 images, diagrams, equations, and sheet music(playable on piano). The unhappy story of a person pursued by dreams of burning. This is the result of 15years of work & teaching the history of fiction with images, from Rodenbach to Sebald, Cole, andRankine. It's intended to break new ground in the use of images and narrative.



Canadian man experiences a crisis while visiting a series of international zoos.

“Is there a difference between dreams and waking life?” wonders Samuel Emmer, the narrator of Elkins’ novel, an expert in protozoa who works in water management for the city of Guelph. “In both, things happen slowly while we watch.” It’s an apt description of this mammoth, formally inventive novel which encompasses text, photographs, diagrams, tables, and sheet music. Over the course of the novel—in which Emmer, who's been volunteered for his city's Zoo Feasibility Committee, travels around the world visiting a series of zoos—the presence of these highly regimented, eminently logical documents begins to make sense. Even as the documents offer reassuring certainty, Emmer’s own grasp on the world is slipping away. The opening scene finds him thinking back on his relationship with his now-college-age child. Emmer is feeling unmoored by life both personally and professionally, and thinks, “When you lose your place in the world, you suddenly wake up, as if your normal life had been a dream.” Soon, Emmer’s waking life alternates with a series of unsettling dreams, some of which hearken back to the landscape of his youth. A note from his interns in which they detail their observation of obsessive traits in him—what Emmer terms “some of the same tics and traits as animals or meth addicts”—sends his behavior in more extreme directions, including lying in a professional context and egging on a child pretending to shoot zoo animals. The novel’s final section, which takes on a very different form from what’s come before, puts much of what we’ve read in a new context, and conveys a powerful sense of loss.

A formally inventive yet emotionally engaging work of fiction. - Kirkus



"WEAK IN COMPARISON TO DREAMS is a novel that will haunt its readers even as it enchants. An astonishing book; mesmerizing, dreamlike, phantastic, grimly real. James Elkins has written a book of shimmering depth. His remarkable, expansive, and materializing imagination at once produces a toppling sense of vertigo and a deep pleasure that so many connections, carelessly unseen, exist all around us. Never before have I felt such empathy for a diagram, nor could I have anticipated such fascination with the compelling descriptions (and depictions) of musical compositions about pain and suffering."—Pippa Skotnes, author of Lamb of God and the Book of Iterations


"Every now and again, a book presents a new type of narrative that alters the way we see literature. James Elkins’s WEAK IN COMPARISON TO DREAMS… surprises as much as it intrigues."—Kimberly Brooks, artist and author of The New Oil Painting


"Experimental in the best sense of the word…"—Eva Schuermann, author of Seeing as Practice: Philosophical Investigations into the Relation Between Sight and Insight


"WEAK IN COMPARISON TO DREAMS is an experimental feast, an illuminated palimpsest, a labour of intellectual love. It will push and pull and ask you ‘just how do you think you read?’"—Maria Fusco, author of History of the Present


"Reveries, dreams, reflections and memories drive this Sebald-inspired narrative through combinations of word and image… Elkins’s novel offers a profoundly provocative exercise in visual thinking."—Hanneke Grootenboer, author of The Pensive Image: Art as a Form of Thinking


"Elegantly written and imaginatively intricate as well as subtle in its capacity to induce readers to become involved in the details of a solitary consciousness."—Charles Altieri, author of Reckoning with Imagination: Wittgenstein and the Aesthetics of Literary Experience


"A moving and profound contemplation on images in relation to dreams, memory, and music….an unbelievably rich and haunting story."—Charlotte Klonk, author of Terror: Wenn Bilder zu Waffen werden (Terror: When Images Become Weapons)


"The long life of Samuel Emmer gives all-world art critic James Elkins an epic canvas on which to entertainingly dramatize the ethics of zoos, the music of contemporary composers, and the lives of amoebas, all in twitchy, often hilarious, high-IQ prose. But all you need to know is that J.S. Bach rocks and James Elkins rolls."—James McManus, author of Positively Fifth Street


"WEAK IN COMPARISON TO DREAMS is unlike any book I have ever read: a fascinating mixture of introspective realism and dreamlike surrealism, of text and image…. Elkins has created a highly original, unique literary work."—Wojciech Drag, author of Collage Literature in the Twenty-First Century


"WEAK IN COMPARISON TO DREAMS is an extraordinary arthroscopic view into a man whose life is liquefying, becoming a chrysalis. Deftly drawing on the sciences and the world of visual representation, it is a story full of wit, tragedy and surprise…"—Kate Joyce, author of Metaphysics


"A stunning achievement, framing profound questions of memory, meaning, and moral responsibility within a highly inventive literary structure. Fundamentally, this is a book about being lost."—Jonathan Anderson, coauthor of Modern Art and the Life of a Culture: The Religious Impulses of Modernism


"A lucid account of a sleepwalking soul becoming increasingly lost as he wrestles with unresolvable conflicts…"—Johanna Drucker, author of Subjective Meteorology and All The Books I Never Wrote


"Elkins presents a series of nested boxes, knowing full well that none will provide a pat explanation of the self, for it is the quest for understanding itself that is offered for us to contemplate."—Anna Arnar, author of The Book as Instrument: Stéphane Mallarmé


"Never unequivocally symbolic, the meta-referentiality of the book will thrill readers who admire Nabokov or Pynchon, the bleak atmosphere those who love Kafka, the narrative flow of naturalism those who like Don DeLillo."—Mark Staff Brandl, artist and author of A Philosophy of Visual Metaphor in Contemporary Art


"WEAK IN COMPARISON TO DREAMS tells the moving story of Dr. Samuel Emmer’s life, his concerns about animal welfare, his dreams about fire and the instability of his self. There is a great generosity of imagination in Elkins’s writing…"—flowerville, author of fortlaufen.blogspot.com


"WEAK IN COMPARISON TO DREAMS introduces entirely new language games. What first appear as illustrations of zoos turn out to be the labyrinths of our own human behavior, by which we pursue our daily lives and cling to the allegories that make us believe in our own ascendency. Manifold dialogues between pictures and words line the verges of the protagonist’s path, ultimately pointing to the few remains of a life."—Lukas Schmutzer, author of “Between Word and Work: On Marianne Fritz’s Whose Language You Do Not Understand”


"Elkins’s novel breaks down the boundaries between word and image, celebrating the intertwining of text and pictures, inviting readers to engage in a new form of storytelling…"—Si Han, author of A Chinese Word on Image


"In this encyclopedic novel innocent zoo inspections spiral into a bubbling maelstrom of madness, lethargically engulfing kaleidoscopes of scientific lore, sheet music, and photographs of dreams."—Evelina Domnitch, author of Orbihedron


"A mesmerizing synesthetic experience and great intellectual pleasure."—Philipp Weiss, author of Am Weltenrand sitzen die Menschen und lachen


"The constellations traced in the reader’s mind by Elkins’s novel in the course of its exhilaratingly irregular orbit through manifold registers of genre and tone will remain fixed there long after the glare of lesser literary fiction has faded."—Douglas Robertson, translator of The Rest Is Slander: Five Stories by Thomas Bernhard


"Elkins enters the field with an exhilarating, surefooted, and profound book."—Charles Green, artist and author of Peripheral Vision and The Third Hand


"The exceptional achievement of WEAK IN COMPARISON TO DREAMS… can only be defined as a new model of the encyclopedic novel."—Jan Baetens, author of My Life to Live


"A fascinating journey… an endless literary feast."—Miguel Ángel Hernández, author of Escape Attempt and Anoxia




James Elkins is a sixty-eight-year-old much-published historian and theorist of visual arts, a professor who holds a chair at the School of the Art Institute of Chicago. Weak in Comparison to Dreams is his first work of fiction, and it is the most courageous and fascinating debut I have read since Mark Z. Danielewski’s multi-media House of Leaves in 2000. Other precursors—obsessive and excessive first fictions—include William Gaddis’s The Recognitions, Thomas Pynchon’s V, and Don DeLillo’s Americana, all concerned with images as Elkins’s novel is. I hasten to add that the origin of “fascinating” is negative, all the way back to a definition as an “evil spell.” Elkins’s courage is casting a binding spell some readers might consider a curse: writing a six hundred–page novel about obsessive compulsion in the voice of an obsessive-compulsive character. His first name is Samuel. Whether or not Elkins wanted the name to remind us of that master of repetition—Samuel Beckett—he is another one of those courageous fascinators.

Elkins’s Samuel Emmer grew up in natural surroundings in Watkins Glen, New York, the son of a “corrosive mother” about whom Samuel says next to nothing. In one of the novel’s two presents, Samuel is a near-forty part-time professor and scientist testing drinking water for amoebae in Guelph, Ontario in 2019. His wife has gone back to Bratislava, his daughter has gone away to college, and Samuel is going off the rails, even off the trails he has followed in his routines both inside and outside his lab. He is, for example, methodically deconstructing the furniture and electronic devices in his apartment. His supervisor, sensing Samuel’s incipient derangement, sends him—maliciously, neutrally, or charitably—on a series of visits to zoos to check on their handling of animals presenting troubling patterns of repetitive behavior.

Samuel empathizes with the animals and tries to imagine the lives of the zookeepers at the first two sites. But his imagination becomes progressively active and then aggressive. He fantasizes his host in Finland is a cyborg, does an existential analysis of a monkey’s mind in Nashville, talks to a host in the voices of spiders in Salt Lake City, and in Basel indulges in total fabrications, insisting at length that his host see suffering animals within a Freudian psychoanalytic framework, and encouraging the children of visitors to pretend to shoot the animals. Samuel feels he is losing his mind and control—and he is—but he is also coming out of his former isolated routines to make connections with others, both humans and animals.

Think of Samuel as Bellow’s professor Herzog forced to visit problematic zoos rather than retreat from his loss of family to the Berkshires where he writes zany letters. Samuel becomes wackily inventive about his credentials (he has none) and charmingly crazed in his identification with animals: “I used to be safe with my amoebas. Little gluey animals, tiny spots of sick. Now animals demented by despair shuffled across the stage of my imagination.” Elkins pushes Samuel along toward paranoia by including documents about animal compulsive behavior that are sent to him between zoo visits by his intern and by Samuel’s former student whom he calls “Viperine.” The more those documents are supposed to help Samuel recognize his own compulsive behavior, the more he imagines hearing the two “helpers” whispering and plotting behind his back. My spot check of the documents finds some are invented, so perhaps Samuel is right to be suspicious of the senders.

When reports of Samuel’s behavior at the zoos get back to his supervisor, Samuel is offered a leave of absence but chooses to abruptly quit his job, take his pension, and leave Guelph. Here there is a break in time in which Samuel writes a manuscript about his breakdown. Never published and almost forgotten, the five hundred–page manuscript is discovered by Samuel in his basement forty years later when he is moving from his home in a rural area of northern Canada where he has been living alone. In the last hundred pages of Weak in Comparison to Dreams (entitled “Notes”), Samuel reflects back on the manuscript and describes his present life. Ah, the old discovered manuscript trick, a timeworn way to show a character’s change. Not for Elkins. Though superficial features of Samuel’s life are different now, he is psychologically essentially the same, still obsessive-compulsive. Maybe he’s even worse off than in his zoo days, for now he doesn’t recognize his problem, has almost no imagination, and cares little about contact with living creatures. “Notes” may make Weak in Comparison to Dreams look like a recovery narrative, but it’s actually a re-cover-up story. As I said, Elkins has courage, perhaps because he’s not a young guy trying to lift off a career as a novelist.

In both parts of the novel, Elkins himself seems obsessed—with the writing workshop’s mantra “Show don’t tell”—and his way of showing reflects his long interest in photography. In What Photography Is, Elkins suggested it’s “a good time to say goodbye to photographs of people.” When Samuel remembers Watkins Glen, Elkins includes a few photos of nature. Then come many photos of ugly zoo cages and enclosures without animals. Stressed by his visits, Samuel most explicitly reveals his repetition compulsion by describing over and over nightmares of forest fires. For each of these dreams, Elkins provides numerous photographs of fire and burned-over land. The documents Samuel’s helpers send also stimulate visuals included in the text: diagrams of animals’ repetitive pacing, of planetary motion, and of Samuel’s routes around his apartment, all of which have a vague figure-eight or infinity form, perfect for OCD. The only humans pictured in the novel are threatened individuals such as Icarus in a few old woodcuts. An “Envoi” has nine pages of individual animals.

The photographs are all black and white, generally about a half page in size, and not particularly artful. Most of the photographs “illustrate” dreams, which are usually frightening to Samuel and yet praised as a release from his daily life, which he says is “weak in comparison to” dreams. Since the sleeping mind is not yet capable of taking photographs, Samuel hunted around for images that would show what he was experiencing at night. Samuel’s accompanying texts follow along, words telling and interpreting what is “shown.”

The photos are numerous and repetitive but, because of their pedestrian quality, are not particularly affecting. Maybe I’m missing Elkins’s intention, but it seems Samuel’s obsessive inclusion of images in his manuscript is yet another sign of his separation and desperation. The photographs don’t connect him to the world, only to its dull and miniaturized simulacra. Elkins’s photographs don’t create a sense of mystery as those of Sebald, or Catherine Lacey in this year’s Biography of X. Instead, Elkin uses the images to imitate his character’s reductive mania. Although the photographs are not what I would have expected in a novel by Elkins the photography critic, they do again demonstrate his courage, his dedication to a unity of subject, style, and media.

“Notes” also has visual materials, not photos but partial representations of scores by experimental composers that Samuel repeatedly plays for himself in his isolated home. He describes the sounds as discordant, harsh, noisy. I don’t read music, but if Samuel is right then the music-producing visuals in “Notes” have an effect similar to that of the earlier photographs. From composing a manuscript often ugly to the eye, Samuel has “moved on” to collecting and playing music even he admits is ugly to the ear. His location and his medium have changed, but Samuel remains locked (like the animals) into himself, trapped in a fugue-like state, a musical term become a psychological one.

Weak in Comparison to Dreams fortunately has several stylistic registers. Even post-Pynchon, the scientific reports, graphs, and formulas would be considered—though ingenious in invention—ugly in a literary novel. Samuel’s commentaries on his dreams are thankfully not surreal; the style is that of an earnest but mystified scientist who can be quite eloquent:

It became difficult to think. It was hard to keep seeing the world on fire, to keep trying to make sense of the onslaught of images. The fires meant something, they needed to be understood. They were like people waving frantically at me, trying to get me to understand something.

In “Notes,” Samuel, now in his nineties, writes in a rather banal, washed-out late style. The novel’s language is most vivid (and novelistic in the manner of those precursors I mentioned) when Samuel is talking to zookeepers or thinking about their animals. That style is not weak in comparison to the style he uses to describe his forest fires and his life in retreat. Either Samuel or Elkins has not, however, lost all imagination, for near the novel’s end are seven pages about one Asger Gaarn, a Danish composer who compulsively wrote throughout his whole life hundreds of preludes and fugues to memorialize other composers, friends, strangers, even pets. Google could not locate Asger Gaarn, the final symbol of obsession.

Because of “Notes,” which is much about the art of experimental music, Weak in Comparison to Dreams has a self-referential or metafictional implication. Once Elkins decided on repetition compulsion, he seems to have adopted exhaustiveness, the stacking of analogues as important as plotting. Musical scores are piled high in Samuel’s home. Speaking of an animal, Samuel says, “The more it becomes disturbed, the longer its behaviors last.” Writing about Protopopov, Samuel says the music is “compelling, and then after a while, it’s boring. It’s fascinating because it’s so alien.” Weak in Comparison to Dreams doesn’t have the worldly variousness of first novels by Gaddis, Pynchon, and DeLillo, but its repetitive excess makes it more alien, and fascinating. Seen as a whole and from some distance, Weak in Comparison to Dreams does connect to a world wider than Samuel’s mind. Humans are like pacing and punding animals, the planet is burning, artists like those Samuel plays are creating work that may be innovative but without content, the music even further from representing the real than the visuals. Elkins is not one of those artists.

Elkins has said his novel is an outtake from a fifteen-year project that includes four other, apparently finished novels that he has described in extravagant detail on his website which is—no surprise—obsessive. I mentioned House of Leaves earlier. Reading Elkins’s website, I see that his novels resemble Danielewski’s multi-volume Familiar project, which is now unfortunately stalled. I hope Weak in Comparison to Dreams receives enough attention so that his small-press publisher will bring out the remaining volumes that will, it seems, add material about Samuel’s life and introduce other characters.

Samuel is a desperate man. I admit I may be desperate to “recuperate,” as the French say, Elkins’s novel, to give its obsessiveness a useful social function. Or, as someone who has written five novels about the same character, I may be desperate to interest readers in a book that casts a spell by repetition. Or after reviewing hundreds of novels, I may be desperate for one that risks a “splendid failure,” as Faulkner said, to make something new, even if that “new” is about humans’ and other mammals’ resistance to or escape from the new. - Tom LeClair

https://www.full-stop.net/2023/10/09/reviews/tomleclair/weak-in-comparison-to-dreams-james-elkins/





What happened that year made me into something different. I feel like a caterpillar unwinding myself into a cocoon, settling in, losing my appetite for leaves, forgetting my fear of birds, contracting my soft green body into a hard brown shell, erasing my caterpillar memories, saying goodbye to the sun and rain, becoming a pupa. Soon I will be lost to myself, and before that happens, I want to write this book.

When we first meet Samuel Emmer, the narrator of James Elkins’ ambitious new novel Weak in Comparison to Dreams, he works for the Water Management Department in Guelph, Ontario. It’s 2019 and, as he puts it, “something was going wrong with me.” His family life has fallen apart, his wife has left him, and his boss has put him on the city’s Zoo Feasibility Committee, which is the last thing he wants to do. His role on the Committee is to travel to other zoos and familiarize himself with their most problematic animals, with the hope that the Guelph’s future zoo might be more humane. Guelph’s zoo planners want “no lions that pace endlessly or elephants that twitch and stomp or chimpanzees that pull their own fur out and scratch themself raw.”

As Samuel travels to zoos in the United States and abroad, two things begin to occur. He begins to emotionally feel the pain of the caged animals he is observing, and he is visited by a series of dreams that become more ominous with each episode. Samuel’s descriptions of his dreams are accompanied by sequences of photographs of forests. The first dreams are of innocent looking woods, a pond, a river. In the fourth dream he sees a distant fire, and with each succeeding dream the fire comes closer, more threatening. By the twelfth and final dream he realizes that “after the burning, the landscapes in my dreams were bare. No fires or smoke. I must have burned my life down.”

Elkins, who is Chair of the Department of Art History, Theory, and Criticism at the School of the Art Institute of Chicago, had let it be known as early as 2008 that he was working on his first novel. Being something a transparency geek, he created a section on his website called Writing Schedule where he laid out the full plan for his novel-to-be and kept readers up to date with his ongoing progress for Weak in Comparison to Dreams, including charts, graphs, word counts, dramatis personae, a synopsis of chapters, and the number of hours spent on the project. Even if you don’t read the novel (and I encourage you to!), take a look at this unique glimpse into the behind-the-curtains image of a novelist at work. If I am reading his chart correctly, Elkins has spent over 15,000 hours on his novel so far. But Weak in Comparison to Dreams, which was just published by The Unnamed Press, is only the beginning. According to Elkins’ website, it is Book 3 of a projected five-volume novel. Elsewhere on his website he refers to the numerous books that influenced his writing, including the massive novel written in multiple columns by Arno Schmidt, Zettel’s Traum (1970), which was finally translated into English in 2016 as Bottom’s Dream (Dalkey Archive Press) and is 1,496 pages long.

Just flipping through this volume’s 600 pages, it’s easy to see one of the reasons why Elkins’ book is so innovative. Weak in Comparison to Dreams is stuffed with b&w photographs (some which have lines drawn on them), charts, graphs, mathematical equations, line drawings, reproductions of old woodcuts, at least one map, and pages containing sections of musical scores. If you take a peek at his website Writing with Images, you’ll quickly see that Elkins has long been interested in the subject of how text and images interact on the page and on our screens. The variety of images he uses in Weak in Comparison to Dreams is unequaled in the world of fiction to my knowledge. Then again, Elkins is not your average art historian. He seems to have mastered multiple other disciplines as well, including several scientific disciplines, advanced mathematics, and contemporary music. But the theme for which he has harnessed these disciplines is deeply human.

As Samuel continues to visits zoos, he sees what we have all sadly witnessed when we have gone to zoos ourselves—that certain captive animals often make obsessive repetitive movements in their cages. Watching an African blue monkey, he sees that “she was protesting her intolerable existence by trying to stop time. If she did the same thing over and over, each time identically, then time would have to stop. She was refusing to let time pass, she was pretending she lived in a single spontaneous moment.” At first the book reproduces charts that graphically replicate the patterned movements of caged animals.

Later on, we see diagrams that Samuel believes show the mind maps of the animals he has been observing.

Finally, Samuel’s intern Vipesh and her “collaborator” Viperine suggest that Samuel himself has developed many of the same traits as the caged animals he has been observing, and we see charts that plot his movements around his own room.

One of the things that Elkins is suggesting is that all of the systems set up to take care of wild animals in zoos—the zoo professionals, the research scientists, the committees, the responsible politicians—have failed, and that only the empathy of individuals who look without prejudice at the unbearable horror of caged animals in zoos can see the emotional tragedy of what is really happening.

Eventually, Samuel quits his job with the Water Department and seems to be going crazy. He gets into his car and drives north toward the Arctic Circle. In the concluding section, Samuel is now a perilously old man who calls himself Emmer. “I live in a cheaply built house a hundred miles north of Guelph. A couple months ago, I was cleaning out the basement, because Fina Hodges told me it was leaking, and I came across the manuscript that I’d nearly forgotten.”

Every day I sit in my study, looking over the pages. I read about the things I said and saw forty years ago. I mainly fail to care about them, or even remember them.

This morning I am looking out the window, where an untrimmed hedge blocks my view of the uncertain distance. Can you say your life is your own when your childhood has gone so far away into the past that the boy with your name seems like someone else’s child? When you read about your own life and there’s no glow of recognition, no pleasure in revisiting scenes that had been long forgotten? I have added these Notes to explain, possibly to someone, how that feels.

Emmer’s only preoccupation in his old age is playing his piano and exploring music written for the solo piano. Composers “are the characters that fill my days and remind me what to feel.” For pages, Emmer thinks rapturously of twentieth century composers and their scores, as if they were old friends.

I see Alexei Stanchinski’s Three Sketches for Piano, feathery and lyrical, written when he was still hanging on to a normal life, before his father died, before he got hallucinations, before he was found dead by a river, not yet twenty-seven years old. Then Ivan Wyschnegradsky’s Nocturnes for the Vologda River, one of his last compositions using ordinary notes, before he decided to adopt the quarter-tones in between the keys on the piano. . . And in a corner of the study, rolled up in a big cardboard tube, is Karlheinz Stockhausen’s Piano Piece 11, a constellation of notes printed on a single enormous sheet of paper, like a map of some fabulous kingdom.

Elkin’s novel, which might at first look off-putting with its suggestion of complex science, higher math, and impenetrable music scores, turns out to be a novel that is all too human, a tragic story of a man who cannot solve the problems he identifies. It’s a novel about failure, empathy, memory, and loneliness. It’s about finding peace in the arts, in this case in music. And it’s a novel that questions the idea that you can truly recall your past. The reader need not master or even understand the various disciplines that Elkins indulges in. In fact, it’s perhaps better to feel a bit estranged from these faintly awe-inspiring practices.

In his summary of this book, which is found on his website, Elkins hopes that his novel will reignite “our love for the ambitious novel.” While there will be plenty of material for academics and those who wish to look deeper into the structure of this novel to pore over and write about, Weak in Comparison to Dreams was written first and foremost to be read and enjoyed. Elkins writes almost like a non-fiction writer. He’s keenly observant and always seeking the perfect description for difficult concepts and complex events, even when writing about Samuel’s dreams. This gives the book a clarity of purpose and a sense of confidence that makes it often exhilarating to read.

As of December 5, he Unnamed Press was offering a limited edition set that included a signed copy of Elkins’ book and a vinyl recording that features the author reading excerpts and playing original piano variations of sheet music that appear in the novel.

[Full disclosure: I was asked to provide a blurb for the back cover of this book, which I was pleased to do after reading it.] - Terry Pitts

https://sebald.wordpress.com/2023/12/06/james-elkins-ambitious-new-novel/

Lionel Erskine Britton - a drama from 1930. in which a giant Computer is set up in the Sahara to run human affairs according to ambiguously Utopian tenets.

  Lionel Britton, Brain: A Play of the Whole Earth , 1930 A Brain is constructed in the Sahara Desert -- presently It grows larger than the ...