Dylan Krieger, Giving Godhead, Delete Press, 2017.
“If a girl, a virus, a horned animal, milkweed, an exchange
of cash for dirty looks, the near-rhyme of greed to death, the names of all
brutes, and a shroud in which was wrapped the erect ascendant all met in an
ovum and, lodged deep in the earth’s core, fused into a supernova. If, from
that long ago time until this very moment—perhaps even into the future—that
supernova were listening in on us, her grave canal located such that she were
overexposed to US American politicovangelizing, all at once began to speak:
this is what she says.” – Danielle Pafunda
“Dylan Krieger is an expert assassin with the messianic
fervor of a deconstructed goth-girl, a rogue priestess exorcising and
excoriating our tricked-out ‘apocalypse fetish,’ dealing out death-blows ‘quid
pro blow.’ These poems are erratic/erotic receivers channeling bad
transmissions from our ‘edenic pandemic’—the media clusterfuck,
body-as-clickbait, that gaslights women into being their own terror portals.
Here unfettered receivership, masochism, and degradation are served as the
ultimate limit experience, the euphoria of the self-detonating female body that
ejects its own organs so that the whole Christ-addled misfire that is our
masculinist moral world ‘might splat.’” —Lara Glenum
“‘… a part of me is always eating part of you…’ This
word-drunk, ‘son-drunk’ book of ecstatic technology doesn’t just profane the
sacred but also – the much less common – sacralizes the profane, the grotesque,
the body in all of its troubling, intoxicating, ruinous splendor. These highly
skilled, outrageous poems move at a breakneck speed.” —Johannes Göransson
“Heady sound-based unabashed blasphemy. Kick in the dick,
pathogenic poetry sure to infect society with exactly the offense it
needs.” —Vincent Cellucci
As its suggestively punning title implies, Giving Godhead is
a volume of poetry that challenges the boundary between the sacred and the
obscene by conflating biblical images of “holy” acquiescence with sexually
deviant forms of submission characteristic of BDSM roleplaying. This conflation
of saintly and sinful acts of submission naturally centers around a meditation
on Christ’s Passion, emphasizing the paradoxical way in which the Christian
savior’s simultaneous authority and obedience fashions him into a
heteronormative archetype of both masculine dominance and feminine submission,
despite his own supposed celibacy. However, the manuscript ultimately looks
beyond individual biblical narratives to illustrate their central commonalities
and even interchangeability, locating echoes of Christ’s violent subjugation in
Torahdic plagues, exiles, and burnt offerings alike. Similarly, this guiding
principle of conflation or interchangeability extends also to Giving Godhead’s
richly musical aesthetic, which features dense wordplay and double entendres in
order to demonstrate the inevitable sensual trans-figurations of a “word made
flesh” merely to be “broken and bruised for our iniquities.” In this way,
Giving Godhead rewrites the foundational narratives of biblical mythology in
light of contemporary gender and social theory, namely by portraying humanity’s
relationship with a monolithic deity as the primordial paradigm of an
imbalanced and abusive power dynamic. - Abstract from Giving Godhead – Dylan Krieger – LSU Master's Theses (2015).
In this new age of the carnivalesque, understatement might
be a greater currency than overstatement. So if I say that Dylan Krieger’s
“Giving Godhead” will be the best collection of poetry to appear in English in
2017, you can trust the understatement, aside from the casual assertion of
prophecy. Seamlessly mixing the religious with the obscene, determined to
create a new form of the grotesque that marries autobiography to personal and
national trauma, Krieger’s book is easily among the most inventive and
successfully performative works to appear in living memory.
Krieger’s title and her dedication to “all god’s / little
trauma children” seem to indicate a specific trauma at the heart of this
collection, although it is never addressed directly. Rather, it haunts the
entire collection, as the inherited God of both Judaism and Christianity
becomes (as the Marquis de Sade once wrote) a being defined by the inherent
violence of his son’s conception. The father who sent “down out of Heaven this
respectable part of himself” embodies an act of violation and generation at
once, and in the logic of both Sade and Krieger thus partakes of those things
we have come most to treasure and to fear — on the one hand, the bread and the
wine, communion and transubstantiation; on the other hand, violent
intercession, assault and rape. Each shares a part of the other’s reality. In a
more conventional narrative sequence, even a sequence of poems, this
interpenetration would acquire sequence and evolution. In Krieger’s collection,
by contrast, it acquires a new poetics rooted in the recent rise of the
Gurlesque movement, with its dramatic wordplay growing out of fury, sexual
violence and paradoxical self-assurance.
The first section, “Quid Pro Blow,” makes the case that
drives the collection — roughly, “You abused me” (and the entire first section
reads the “you” on both macro- and micro-scales) “so watch what I do to you.”
But if the primal wound to the speaker here is physical and psychic, she is not
out for physical revenge. Rather, she takes on a kind of underground Zohar
meditation, as in the poem “rectifire”:
WHAT JUST GOD
WOULD PLANT A
LANDMINE IN THE
GARDEN IN THE
FIRST PLACE???
WOULD PLANT A
LANDMINE IN THE
GARDEN IN THE
FIRST PLACE???
Then she goes further, wondering if what some of us might
quaintly call “original sin” in fact invokes a “surprise, surprise: forced
consent isn’t anyone’s crime but the fire’s / hanging right above our heads.”
The Fall here is perpetual forced consent from birth; rape is one consequence.
The problem with rape in “Giving Godhead” is that, unlike the “forced consent”
of being human, rape won’t stop giving: the “rape dreams” she cites (in
“swaddling plot”) lead to an anxiety of influence when God, unable to bear the
burden of his story, creates the Flood and simultaneously sets in motion the
motion in which “the Old Testicles always give rise to the New.”
Rape dreams, by a variety of names, haunt the first section
of the book: In “biblical umbilical,” when the narrator tries from childhood to
imagine a cord back to the divine, she learns in the end “no one’s guarded by —
an angel but a bomb.” The shift in scale here is clearly intentional, as the
poem foreshadows the expansion in the second part of the book from individuals
and dreams toward the larger problem of human lineage, set partly in the
language of 20th-century analytic philosophy. The third section explodes that
larger problem with its conclusions about the impossibility of conjuring any
legitimate answer to the First Question: “Why?”
Krieger’s poetry echoes her earlier academic scholarship on
the Gurlesque — a movement that, according to Arielle Greenberg, “was born
between about 1960 and 1982 (it was a long labor)” and that came into focus in
Greenberg and Lara Glenum’s 2010 anthology, “Gurlesque: The New Grrly,
Grotesque, Burlesque Poetics.” The Riot Grrrl scene was loosely connected, but
so were “elements from Sesame Street childhoods, Goth, punk, grunge and ballet
class,” Greenberg explains in her introduction. Artifice and camp (“from cosmos
to cosmetics,” as the poet and critic Daniel Tiffany has written, in a phrase
Glenum quotes in her own introduction to the anthology) — anything that might
be anti-objectified or hyper-objectified in protest, anything that might be
re-embraced as a claim to power rather than submission, anything that might
have roots in fear and contamination and nevertheless be nurtured into a
celebration of resistance — became part of the movement. But one sentence near
the end of Glenum’s introduction is of particular interest when it comes to
“Giving Godhead”: “Gurlesque poets,” she writes, “owe a great deal to Emily
Dickinson, the original Goth girl.”
Above all, “Giving Godhead” makes an implicit case that, if
Dickinson had been able to turn her rage at the mysteries of the world outward
and also invited the sea to follow her inside, she would have blown the lid on
creation as a direct precursor to Dylan Krieger. Krieger’s lack of a direct
precursor, despite the abundant literary, religious and philosophical
references embedded in the ingenious wordplay of her collection, is part of
what makes “Giving Godhead” completely remarkable. Not sui
generis — the rape dreams came from somewhere. But the places where
they go in this book are places I have never seen any poet go before. “Giving
Godhead” blows several giant craters out through the walls of our inherited and
now somewhat cowed Western selves. It is a bomb with an angel behind it. - Thomas
Simmons
So you missed Allen Ginsberg’s oral-earthquake “Howl” at Six
Galleries in SFO on Friday, October 6, 1955. Stop lamenting. “Howl”’s heir
is at your fingertips. NOW. It’s by Dylan W. Krieger.
Dylan
W. Krieger’s February 2017 Giving Godhead, from Delete Press, is
such a City Lights oral performance on the page that you might be forgiven—if
anyone is forgiven for anything in Giving Godhead, which is
not always clear—for thinking that you had heard the “new” Ginsberg. But
Ginsberg himself surely would have trouble with this proto-nostalgic reverence,
for who would the “new” Ginsberg be? Certainly not anyone who sounded
“like” Ginsberg. The new Ginsberg would somehow have to do the old one
better, would have to re-map the territory. This is what Giving
Godhead does. If Krieger is quickly becoming the oracle of a
generation (and her dreamland trash will be out from Saint
Julian Press in time for AWP in February 2018), Giving Godhead is
a manifesto that invokes Ginsberg while owing nothing aside from history to
him.
If you
order a copy of Giving Godhead, you will receive a paperback
with a color/black-and-white cover of a dead, carbuncled body praying, an
apparently-live tongue being dissected, perfect fingernails on hideously
contorted fingers, and a skull cut open at the back to reveal nothing but
crumpled paper. You will also find an epigraph from the Marquis de Sade and,
most moving, a dedication to “all god’s/ little trauma children/ lonely
kneeling/ molested & infected/ for they shall/ inherit his girth./” By the
time you get to the first section of the book, “Quid pro Blow,” you know you
are holding as much a manifesto as Ginsberg ever managed, but altered radically
by gender, generation, and method: the narrator of this collection has gathered
all of Ginsberg’s mouthy assertions into that great ball of a question, the
“why virus,” aimed directly at the nature of creation and its fundamentalist
interpretations and seriously injured along the way by a body that can be at
once itself and its opposite, the embodiment of extreme pleasure and the site
of extreme unsought hell. Though the poem “why’s virus” doesn’t come till page
55, near the end of the collection, its traumatized and fierce voice undergirds
the entire book. This voice doesn’t need to inherit an “earth”: it needs to
inherit a “girth” equivalent to God’s failed presence, His failure to save, to
rescue. There. That’s the truth. For those of us who know and read this book as
a balm of truth, that’s the truth. And Krieger gets it, over, and over, in a
collection that opens and closes with a deracination of syntax and a fury that
reminds us—if we needed reminding—that a deep and foolish complacency lies at
the heart of the principle of a “JUST GOD” who would PLANT A LANDMINE IN THE
GARDEN IN THE FIRST PLACE??? (“rectifier,” p. 15).
At
first glance, Giving Godhead looks a little as if someone had
given Emily Dickinson Adderall—lots of em-dashes, short lines, long long lines
that don’t in fact sound like Ginsberg, nearly every conceivable variant on
poetic form. Ironically, the one poem that most “looks” like a poem, “why’s
virus,” also contains both the most deeply moving, earnest child’s moment and
the most potent “note to the self.” If you are raised to be devoutly religious
but have the propensity at every moment to ask “why,” questioning becomes a
virus—which is to say, you become a disease to the converted—and the “why”’s never
stop, in part because—behind those questions—you realize that you, little
mortal kid that you are, are actually kinder, more loving, and more just than
the God you are being taught to worship, and worshipping a Creator who is
inferior to ordinary you is obscene: yet that is what happens, day after day. “note to
the self: roar to the world: the lord is just another dirty
bird” (“why’s virus,” p. 55). But roaring doesn’t mean you’re not already
infected, and part of that “infection” is sexuality: no better example in the
experience of being human than such intense, private pleasure as a young child
discovering her body but also intense pain and shock at what others inflict.
Sexual trauma and divine betrayal are the two harmonic vibrations beneath all
of Giving Godhead, and though no specific moment of violation
is named (though “quid pro blow,” about forced oral sex, is about as graphic as
one could get), the narrator spells it out in “apostles anonymous” (p. 53): on
the one hand she is such a spiritual failure that her only purpose is to await
the inevitable rape (and “rape dreams” appear in “in media rape” (p 14), “scaredy creature”
(p. 19), “swaddling plot” (p. 21), and “automessiah” (p. 24); on the other
hand, in her fury at her unasked-for and untenable position she has
become de facto a force to be reckoned with, one who in the
absence of a just God is entirely capable, if need be, of inheriting God’s
“girth.”
Krieger
is a scholar of Latin and 20th-century analytic philosophy as well as a poet--Giving
Godhead won the Robert Penn Warren Prize for best MFA thesis at
Louisiana State University in 2015—and it’s worth studying her curriculum
vitae at dylankrieger.com for its abundance of prior publications, a
number of them “academic” articles that presage her future work. Krieger’s
engagement with the “Gurlesque,” via Lara Glenum and Arielle
Greenberg’s 2010 anthology Gurlesque, is useful as a reminder
that defiance is not a one-note performance (and Krieger’s interest here centers
as much on contemporary visual performance art as it does on literature).
Defiance embraces the “grotesque,” including the improbable orifices and
excretions of the body, re-defining the body as necessary with humor and wit;
defiance embraces pleasure at the bodily and emotional sites of
historically masculocentric dominance; definance embraces
the “riot-grrrl” within the interpretable text of the secretly wounded.
Krieger’s work shows its debt to the “Gurlesque.”
But in
retrospect—as with queer Ginsberg—nothing really in the past could prepare the
world for the prophetic paradigm ofGiving Godhead. If—veering
sharply for a moment away from Krieger’s text—Harold Bloom’s brilliant redactor
J, whom Bloom renders female, had for a night muted her wounds to sleep with
the ancient poet-warrior David, who himself exceeded his creator, the result,
lost in the dust of history, would have been a new and outraged heaven and a
new and outraged earth. In our new time, not 1955 but 2017, that result is the
new howl, Giving Godhead. - Thomas Simmons
Far Cry
A far cry from full tide. A far cry from curtain & cord.
A fist full of quick tinsel. A fuck ton of lost fur. He said ‘are you wearing
spurs?’ I said ‘no, but I’ve a belt made of blacksmiths.’ Yes, all the
blacksmiths I have blown. All the blacksmiths I have heated
up/hammered/burst/beaten into gold. They are a hoard of a thousand horses,
mounting fire in the dust. They flagellate their bellies to burlap, they scrape
their fat faces to fringe. I mean to say I pricked them with a nasty nettle,
or, I packed in their pistols with clay. Either way, they are made to push up
my marina body. Either way, I am full of mad boats. They are walked on by the
far cries of the drowning in the harbor towns. They are burnt by the search
lights in the bay. There is a prize in my navel for the one who swallows the
largest electric eel. There is a button. A kettle. A basket of bruised fruit.
There is a locket with a picture of a peasant penetrating a lighthouse, his
hind haunch to the sea, in the shadow of a fish-filled wave.
BOTTOM FEEDER
by Dylan Krieger
by Dylan Krieger
.
but nowadays your garbled barbles never tasted better. no matter how much your bog moss makes love to the gutter, you still wonder what’s next once you ditch the catfish trap house, with all its iridescent claws a-clash. not everybody can handle a bottom feeder’s garbage trundle, but me? i’m of another puddle. the ones who’d rather eat their demons than leave them to their own diseases. the ones who never lost that most primeval thanatoxic fever. with one foot on the cantilever and the other streaming dirty needles, i pull myself up from the river by my peaty skin and shingles, dripping maladapted tadpoles and the urge to binge on roadside litter, because under every dumpster baby is a mother too tired to keep treading water, and a smoke signal for all the subaqueous fathers who taught her what the thunder said was not for her to ponder, who fed her ageless algae to the alligators just to watch her botched face flounder
designated hitler
Poetry/Fiction
“the hole that cannot hold you” & “noble roman.” Xavier
Review, forthcoming.
“the war of all against all.” Neighborhood Anthology, forthcoming.
“gateway dick.” Fine Print issue 6, Summer 2017.
“the war of all against all.” Neighborhood Anthology, forthcoming.
“gateway dick.” Fine Print issue 6, Summer 2017.
“babes taste better,” “patient full of porch lights,”
“medical fetishist,” “tell the protesters i
have been their kind,” & “the
moon howls back.” Nine Mile Magazine vol.
4, no. 2, Spring
2017.
“bottom feeder.” Cleaver
Magazine issue 18, Spring 2017.
“cesarean vegetarian.” Phoebe issue
46.2, Spring 2017.
“designated hitler” &
“infanticide in outer space.” concīs, Spring 2017.
“spring broke
half a nation-state away.” (b)OINK, Spring 2017.
"swampman,” philosophical zombie,” “the problem of
sunrise,” & “zeno’s paradox(es).” Seneca Review, Spring 2017.
“fake barns” and “the distracted
driver.” Midwest Review, Spring 2017.
“the suicidal idealist,” “quantum immortality,” “the violinist,” “the veil of ignorance,” & “trolley problem.” Reality Beach, Winter 2017.
"the floating man,” “teletransportation,” & “ship of theseus.” Coffin Corner, Spring 2017.
“the suicidal idealist,” “quantum immortality,” “the violinist,” “the veil of ignorance,” & “trolley problem.” Reality Beach, Winter 2017.
"the floating man,” “teletransportation,” & “ship of theseus.” Coffin Corner, Spring 2017.
“swampman,” philosophical zombie,” “the problem of sunrise,”
& “zeno’s paradox(es).” Seneca Review, Spring 2017.
“msg heard round the
world.” moss trill, Fall 2016.
“millennial masochist”
& “sorry not sorry.” Cloud Rodeo, Spring 2016
"bomb countdown." Maintenant, Spring
2016.
“plantation nation.” Reality
Hands, Spring 2016.
"hero's last-second super-strength." Jam
Tarts, Spring 2016.
"god
complex." Witch Craft, Spring 2016.
“stakeout
the stakeout” & "torch the place & watch it burn." Inklette, Spring
2016.
“absence knows best.” No
Assholes, Winter 2016.
“briefcase full o’ $$$” & “cryptic phone call," &
"firing gun at nothing while screaming." THAT Literary
Review, Spring 2016.
"automatomic," "over[h]eating," "money
/ talk," "submissive's song," & "belting." Atrocity Exhibition,
Winter 2016.
"tiny facial lacerations." Coup d'Etat,
Winter 2016.
"no hard line" & "headless rain." Local
Nomad, Winter 2016.
“hero
tied up w/ buzz saw moving toward junk” & "I
see right through you to the real you who is also
see-through." Rogue Agent, Winter
2016.
“un-cudgel.” Fine Print, Fall 2015.
“borderline,”
“ghost porn,” & “committed.” Unlikely Stories, Summer
2015.
“a ritual
feeding // in need of meter,” “canticle cannibal,” “how a godhead cums // to
earn his stripes,” “ménage à trinity,” &
“swaddling plot.” Tenderloin,
Summer 2015.
“[R]AM.” Psychopomp, Spring
2015.
“in media rape”
& “bad news, new world order.” Juked, Spring
2015.
“Agateophobia” & “original
schism.” Deluge, Spring 2015.
“biblical umbilical.” Small
Po[r]tions, Winter 2015.
“why’s virus.” So and
So, Winter 2015.
“Cultures” & “rite
hype.” la fovea, Fall 2014.
“Acarophobia” &
“peri-.” Foothill, vol. 4.1, Fall 2014.
“saint drain.” Birds of Lace’s
“30 x Lace,” Spring 2014.
“Phobiaphile
1-4” & “fuck white space.” Smoking Glue Gun vol. 7,
Fall 2013.
“Filled.” The Lost Piece, Spring 2012.
“Profit,”
“O Tell, Motel,” & “Art de Miss.” Re:Visions, Spring
2011.
“Stream” & “Big City Street.” 3 Cup
Morning, Summer 2007.
Essays
"Bridging Divides & Transgressing Boundaries in Morani
Kornberg-Weiss's Dear Darwish." New Delta Review,
Fall/Winter 2014.
“Morrettian
‘Abstract Models’ for Poetry Analysis.” Jacket 2, Fall 2014.
“Secrets, Secretions, and Sorcery in Tracey McTague’s Super Natural.” HTMLGIANT, Spring 2014.
“Girls, Gimmick, and Gore: The Echo of Feminist Performance Art in the Emerging ‘Gurlesque.’” Through Gendered Lenses, Spring 2012.
“Real ID: A Make-Believe Solution.” Fresh Writing, Spring 2009.
“Secrets, Secretions, and Sorcery in Tracey McTague’s Super Natural.” HTMLGIANT, Spring 2014.
“Girls, Gimmick, and Gore: The Echo of Feminist Performance Art in the Emerging ‘Gurlesque.’” Through Gendered Lenses, Spring 2012.
“Real ID: A Make-Believe Solution.” Fresh Writing, Spring 2009.
forthcoming from Saint Julian Press, dreamland trash (66
pp.) is a book of poems centered on the stigmatized and/or criminalized margins
of American society—particularly drug culture, queer culture, hookup culture,
internet culture, conspiracy theories, mental illness, and the anxieties that
accompany our conscious complicity in impending self-extinction. The method of
its composition is largely collage, drawing snippets of text from overheard bar
chatter, hallucinogenic rants, alien abduction documentaries, government
documents, and YouTube’s often nonsensical automatic captioning software. As a
result, the book ultimately presents a fractured post-apocalyptic vision of
American culture that prioritizes substances and resources over human ties and
still willfully and woefully denies the inevitable consequences of climate
change even under the ominous skies of an increasingly shadowy
military-industrial complex.
no ledge left to love
no ledge left to love (65 pp.) is a full-length
prose poetry project that reimagines and challenges the frameworks of Western
philosophical thought experiments, especially with respect to gender, moral
certitude, and diachronic identity. Each poem focuses on a different thought
experiment in analytical philosophy, from Plato’s allegory of the cave to
Nagel’s spider in a urinal. Recognizing that Western philosophy—like all
academic disciplines—has been largely dominated by wealthy cis straight white
men, no ledge attempts to dismantle the reductive binaries and
disembodied logic of the analytical philosophical vernacular, emphasizing
instead the rich physicality and potent mutability of the bodies required to
convey its lofty ideas.
Re:ACTION!
Re:ACTION! (90 pp.) catalogs
and satirizes the action-packed scenes we have watched evolve into a sort of
American mythology of violence between the forces of good and evil. In
these lyrical and narrative poems written collaboratively with Vincent
Cellucci, we approach the well-worn subjects as general scenarios rather
than trivializing them by name-dropping individual films. Titles include
"briefcase full o' $$$," “firing gun at nothing while screaming,”
"bomb countdown," "lone witness' incomprehensible last words,"
"torch the place & watch it burn," and "hanging from cliff
// stepping on fingertips", and “human shield.” We think these tropes are
very symptomatic of our escapist and violence-saturated culture. Contemporary
social issues present in the manuscript include our national preoccupation with
war and addiction, xenophobic villainizing of the "other," the
presence of a police state, sexualized depictions of physical domination, and
the persistence of reductive gender stereotypes in Hollywood
blockbusters.
We believe this text will have a broader market base than
other poetry publications since it appeals to pop cultural studies and film
lovers everywhere. We are looking for a press to actively support this
project and help us reach a wide audience.
the mother wart
the mother wart (70 pp.) is a book of prose
poems loosely based around the tenets of the Church of Euthanasia, whose
only commandment--for both ethical and practical reasons--is "thou shalt
not breed." Looking beyond the movement's environmental and social
goals, the mother wart delves into an autobiographical
meditation on early memories and associations with motherhood, childbirth,
infancy, and female sexuality, emphasizing the importance of early childhood
trauma in the decision to abstain from having children of one's own. In its
thick fog of sound play, close-set cycles of internal rhyme evoke a nursery
rhyme starting to spin off-kilter, a grade-school chant turned violent and
unpredictable. This is the version of the fairy tale in which the witch wins.
But here, the witch is also mother, the origins of life transformed into a sign
of virus (the wart). The grotesque, therefore, figures heavily throughout these
poems, especially in the sense of Mary Russo's The Female Grotesque,
which points out the pregnant female body constitutes the epitome of the human
form as a site of volatile and irrepressible change--traversing that rare
region between revulsion and attraction, in which the two at last appear
not so opposed after all, but rather the respective poles of a dividing line
that in fact comes full circle if followed far and fearlessly enough.
DeWitt Brinson: Take a word for a form of genitalia and write a brief history of it as if it were apart of a royal family.
Dylan Krieger: If ‘cunny’ were royalty she’d be rock ‘n’ roll royalty. None of that inbred Grand Duchess shit. Or maybe she’s a pagan nature goddess, one with the earth because she comes from a long line of terms for ‘rabbit hole.’ She’s happy with the rabbits coming in and out of her. But she resents, like her step-sister ‘sheath,’ being named for an empty space defined by what fills it, so she kills off all the undressed peasants filling her land and replaces them with retractable pillars of trance-inducing dildo fog.
DB: What do you do when you have trouble with writing?
Dylan Krieger: Lately I’ve developed a very specific solution to this problem. To wit: I watch YouTube videos (usually about some niche conspiracy theory or another) with the auto-generated closed captions on. The most inventive or nonsensical of the resulting phrases make their way into my poem, but the connective tissue I still supply myself.
DB: Think of a happy childhood memory. What is one of your favorite poems and where were you when you first read it?
Dylan Krieger: One of my favorite poems is still Plath’s “Daddy,” echoes of whose rhymey cheekiness can certainly be heard in my own work. I was homeschooled all the way through high school, so I’m sure I first read it at my parents’ kitchen table, probably around 9th grade. The irony is that, despite its simple children’s-book rhymes, the poem depicts a decidedly unhappy childhood, and I think that’s what attracted me. I’ve always adored the creeptastic chemical reaction between a poem’s music and its underlying mythos
DB: Take a deep breath. Now scream while writing until you run out of scream.
Dylan Krieger: FUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCKTHEWHIRLEDINALLITSOCEANICATTACKZONEZZZZZZ
DB: What are some of the ways you’ve imagined yourself dying?
Dylan Krieger: I’m always either drowning or in a car accident. My car is normally the only place I feel free to scream (except for just now), so I spend a disproportionate amount of time there. Add to that the overall frequency of fatal car accidents in the US, and chances are…
DB: Did you have any imaginary friends? If so, who? If not, why weren’t you more popular in your imagination?
Dylan Krieger: All my friends are imaginary. My imagination is the milieu in which I am most popular, for sure. But since I base a lot of my creative output on real-life input (see q. 2), all of my imaginary friends are basically subversive caricatures of people I actually know. For example, there’s this coked-out version of my mom I sometimes like to ask grown-up gatekeeper questions like how many exemptions I can claim on my taxes.
DB: How does the way you think of yourself differ from how you want other people to think of you??
Dylan Krieger: I fear I’m rather scatterbrained and live by no clear moral code. But as long as other people don’t judge, I’m alright with them finding out. (Trouble is, they usually do.)
DB: What are the differences and similarities between good and bad poems?
Dylan Krieger: I often joke that the only difference between a good and bad poem is its unapologeticness, also known as its don’t-give-a-fuck-ness. Little secret: I used to be an angsty punk kid, and I still put a high premium on art that’s loud, brash, and in-your-face rather than “pretty.” I also just get bored really easily, so I favor the punchy, the raunchy, the violent, and the depraved. Of course I’m well aware there’s lots of good poetry that doesn’t fit that description, but it tends to put me to sleep before I can reflect much on its deeper merits.
DB: What’s the last thing you argued about? Please describe it as if it were an argument between two kittens.
Dylan Krieger: Napping arrangements. Basically Vince & I were some scruffy tabbies who had just gotten attacked by this big ugly bulldog called Cyclobenzaprine, and we both wanted to sleep in this one nook of the Cat Palace but we couldn’t both fit. Luckily we were too zonked to clash claws, but later I guilted him for not caring about my happiness enough to back down sooner.
DB: Take a minute or two to recall some great sex you’ve had. Now describe your writing.
Dylan Krieger: Conveniently, I’m unable to describe my writing without thinking of great sex. Ha. But seriously: poetry is highly musical for me, and hence highly sensual, physical, carnal. There was a time when I wrote a lot of homophonic translation, but even my best attempts at “pure” sound poetry were no more fulfilling than a really hot one-night-stand. Now, when I challenge myself to infuse the same dense sound play with some near-coherent meaning, the result is much closer to those third-date consummation butterflies everybody’s always cocooning for. - http://www.tender-loin.com/krieger_interview.html
Dylan Krieger is a pile of false eyelashes growing algae in
south Louisiana. She lives in a little cottage with a catfish and her demons
and sunlights as a trade mag editor. Her first book, Giving Godhead, is
forthcoming in 2017 from Delete Press. Her other poetry projects include a
collaborative satire of big-budget action movies, a collage of automatic
captions from alien abduction documentaries, and (mostly recently) an
irreverent reimagining of philosophical thought experiments. Find more of her
work at www.dylankrieger.com.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.